My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-18-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
01-18-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2023 1:52:55 PM
Creation date
10/5/2023 1:49:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(• .T. I <br />L« • <br />I • <br />\ <br />m <br />f i»«f <br />CITY OF ORONO <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />473-7357 <br />APPLICATION NO. 1877 <br />NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date of Notice: 10/28/93 <br />TO: Tandem Properties/Peter Aixlrca Co <br />c;o Dick Putnam <br />2765 Casco Point Road <br />Wayzaia, MN 55391 <br />COPIES: <br />TYPE OF APPLICATION: Sketch Plan Review <br />DATE OF MEETLNG: 10/25/93 <br />COLTSCIL ACTION - MOTION: (No action required) <br />Council considered the various issues and concerns raised by the developer and staff. <br />While no specific vote was taken, general direction in a number of areas included: <br />1. General suppon for preservation of "Ancient Ones" site via an outlot or park lot <br />dedicated to the public, with the following thoughts: <br />Applicant and property owner to provide substantial written documentation <br />from appropriate sources (Native American representatives. State <br />• archeologist, etc.) that the site being preserved is the proper location, that <br />this is an acceptable way to preserve it. etc. <br />- Provide documentation of expected future uses. <br />City likely will not provide funding for preservation and/or maintenance <br />of bam or house, and feasibility of preserving same is questioned. <br />2. Trail system concept generally met with positive response. <br />3. MLxed reaction on the need for road connection corridor on Coffin property; <br />connection corridor should be dedicated on Dickey property as shown; City intent <br />to consider cul*de-sac as private roads until such time that connector links are <br />actually built. <br />4. General agreement that no septic setback to Type I wetlands is needed. <br />5. Somewhat mixed reaction to the issue of dry-buildable credit for Type 1 wetlands, <br />but no final decision was forthcoming. This issue will be placed on Council’s <br />November 8th agenda for further discussion. <br />6. The question of future City sewer was raised.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.