Laserfiche WebLink
msy tyui D# Horn ccns id«r at ion onlyrCMttf it iscluddf or c^quir^s «n ar«A not own«d bf tn«>pllc«i%t tlut could c«JiOftabl/ bm obtJin«d, ut«d. aipaiuUd* oc in^qid to fuICill tfto bjstc pucpoM oC thm proposed pro]«ct:C&) th« qoMrai tuitabilicy ot aitacnata itas consldacad by tba appLlcanti(c) wfiotaac rtascaabla oodiCicatiOci ot lb#ixo. ftcopa configuration, or danjity oC tba pro|act uould aaoid ipacts to uatlmdj;(d) aCforta by tha applicnt to acconaodata: caoova ccnatcalntt on alttrnatlvai iapoaad by tociiog :andacds oc latrastcuctuca. inclodlo^ raq;uasta (oc conditional pacalti, 7actanccf. oc plannad unit davalopntiiti; and (a) tba physical, cccaoaic. and danoqrapbic <br />*^icanants of tba projact. Ecoocnic coasidarat tons alona do <br />It naka an altaxoativa not faasibla and pcudmot. <br />|J) If• tba local qovarnnant unit datarninas that <br />faasibla and prudent altarnatlva axiats that would avoid <br />'PdCta to watlaads. it sbaii dany tha caplacanrnt plan. IC no <br />*asiblt aod prudent altatnativa is available that *^uld av-oid <br />tpacts to uatlaodSf tba local govarnnanc unit shall avaluata <br />la rtplacenant plan for cospLianca with subparts 4 to 4. <br />Subp. 4. Datacniaatioa of inpact aiaiaizatioa. <br />a. Tha applicant shall danonstrata to tha local <br />»vtmnant onifs satisfaction that th# actl/ity will niniaiTt <br />ipaets to wetlands, lo raviawing tha sofCiclency of tha <br />>plicant*s efforts to ainiaiza vat land iapacts. the Local <br />ivaraaant unit aust considac: <br />(1) tha spatial requirements of the project; <br />(2) the location of existing structural ot <br />itural faatisras that oiay dictate tha placement oc conf igurJt ion <br />! tha project; <br />(3l tha purpose of the project and bow the <br />irpcse relates to placement, conf i*jurat ion. oc density: <br />y) the sensitivity of the site design to <br />^e natural features of the site, including topogciph/. <br />ideology, and existing vegetation: <br />(5) the value, function, and spatial <br />iStrltutlOA of the wetlands cc tne site; <br />C5) indi/idual jr.d O'iau.jtive lapacts; ind <br />iZ) xa applicant's efcorcs to: <br />(3) sodify the sire, scope. <br />Kifiguratita. or density of the prcjeci; <br />13) rcaove oc accoaaodace site <br />onstraintf ir.cluding toning, inf cast ructure. access, oc natural <br />eatures: aod <br />fcj otherwise ainialre »xpacts. <br />B. If the local goveffoient uni: finds that an <br />ppllcant has not ccapLied with tha rcqulccaents to ainiaire <br />•sfland lapacts. the local goverraier.t unit shall list. In <br />I <br />\ <br />writing, its oojectiuna Id - • •applicant does not withdraw tha project proposal or Udicat# intent to subait an amended project proposal satisfying the local governastit unit’s objections, ths stattaent of objectineissnail constitute a denial.Subp. S. Ostscmloatloa of iapact cectlf lest loo. teaporacy impacts to a wetland aust be rectified by rspsicing. rehabiUtatiag. oc restoring the affected wetlaad.X. Xctivltles may qualify Cot a no-loss detttalMtloo in part 1420.0220 by meeting all of the foliowlag ccm^tioast (1) the physical characteristics of the affected wetland, including ground elevations# contours. Inlet diaensioas. outlet dimensions# substrate, and hydrologic are restored to pr.project conditions sufficient to ensue# that <br />all preproject functions and values are restored: <br />C2| the activity Is completed and the physical <br />characteristics of tbe wetland are restored within six months oi <br />th. st.ct oC th. .cti.ltfl *n<l <br />(3) th. p.ctf tespooaihl. for ih. activity <br />provid«s « p.cfor«anc* bo«a to th. local govatwnt tth.t *« <br />aKuAt saCfici.at to cov.e th. .stl*at.d coat to t.scor. t^ <br />wetland to pccproject cooditiona. '?he local 90Wttn«.ftt «n t <br />shall rttuen th. pecfocoance bond to th. c.apoaslbl. party u^n <br />a d.t.caination by th. local 90v.cnn.nt .nit that th. conditions <br />in this it.m and ItM a hav. b..o net. <br />B. An applicant shall b. 9rant.d a no-loss <br />daterninatioA under the criteria in It*. A one. in a t.n-y.4» <br />p«tiod for a particular ail. within a wetland, asc.pt that <br />repairs to th. ociginal project shall b« allowed under the <br />no-loss d«tec«ination. If the local goveemwot ualt detet«loes <br />th. request to be n.ctsaary and reasonable. <br />C. Wetland inpacts that do not qualify for a no-los» <br />deterelr.ation according to th. cticetia in iieo A ate subject to <br />replaces.nt under th. criteria in pacts 8120.0530 to StJO.OslO. <br />Subp. 6. Oetetainal ton of reduction t.c .lieloation of <br />iapacts over tiae. Aft.: an activity is coaplet.J, Cutth.e <br />uetljp.d :spacts from the draining or filling aust b. reduced oc <br />eliaitated by aaintaining. opetacing, and managing the proj.ee <br />in a cannec that pteierves and maintains remaining wetland <br />functions and values. The local government unit aust requite <br />applicants to implvnect ocst Management practice* to protect <br />wetland (unctions and values. <br />Subp. 7. Onavoidable impacts. Una/oidatle wetland iMpacts <br />that remain after efforts to ain-aiz., rectify, oc reduce or <br />eliainate them must b. replaced according to parts 8420.051 to <br />3420.0630. <br />Subp. 8. Wetlands on cultivated fields. If the wetland is <br />located Of. a cultivated field, replacement must be accompLIs-neJ <br />through restscation without regard to the priority orde. • <br />lutpact 1. A wetland drained ot filled under this provision