My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
02-22-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2023 1:51:34 PM
Creation date
10/5/2023 1:48:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r 1 <br />D. Replacement Wetlands <br />1. The grading plans and replacement/removal plan indicate <br />the areas proposed for replacement. The table of \%t?tland <br />replacement indicates the sizes of removal and replaced <br />weUands. The type of wetlands being replaced is <br />explained in the F.J. Svoboda and Associates report. The <br />type of replacement wetland is shown on the Replace <br />ment Plan with type I, II or 111. <br />2. The r-lOO’ scale Grading/Drainage pUm provides plans for <br />the drainage and wetland replacement. F.J. Svoboda iind <br />Associates will be consulting with the developer to <br />construct the Type I. II iind III wetlands. <br />3. The Coffin/Gronberg plans illustrate areas of excavation for <br />ponds, replacement or removal of existing draintile. <br />installation of outlet structures, and erosion control <br />measures. <br />4. The soils of the removed type 1 wetlands will be used o <br />rebuild tlie new type 1 areas. The Ha and Co soils in <br />these areas will support the new areas, likewise the <br />existing vegetation will fill in these areas. <br />5. Construction of the wetlands vsill begin with site grading in <br />April/May '94 with completion by July/August '94. <br />0. Applicant does not have form requested. (MCWD needs to <br />provide form.) <br />7. The replacement wetland was not previously restored or <br />created under prior approval plans. To tl'.e best <br />owner’s or applicant's knowledge. (R.A. Putnamly^^f^^ <br />8. The replacement wetland was not drained or filled during <br />the past tenyea^ to applicant's knowledge. (R.A. <br />Putnam) <br />9. The replacemOTt wetland was not restored with financial <br />asistance from public conservation prt^aim to the <br />applicant ’s knowledge. (R.A. Putnam <br />10. The replacement was not r^ored with private loaned <br />funds. (R.A. Putnam) <br />11. The applicant will use its wetland consultant and ask tJie <br />MCVVD staff to evaluate the construction efforts during <br />the process and to inspect upon completion.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.