My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
02-22-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2023 1:51:34 PM
Creation date
10/5/2023 1:48:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning File # 1903 <br />February 17, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />Since the sketch plan review staff has learned that part of the subject property is torrcns <br />property and the lot line rearrangement must be recorded as a formal plat. Note surveyor’s <br />notations advising of vague descriptions for boundaries of undeveloped lot along Wildhurst Trail <br />and Tonkaview Ijne. Surveyor has advised that the plat will not be accepted by Registrar of <br />Title Office with these boundary discrepancies. Applicant must file for a registration of <br />undeveloped lot for plat to be accepted by the County. <br />The applicant chose not to file a variance application with the subdivision application. <br />Before Mr. Lemmerman priKeeds with any further expenditure of funds for registration of <br />propertv', filing of variance application and platting costs, the proposed subdivision will be <br />presented for Council ’s conceptual approval. <br />fhe Planning Commission may act on the current preliminary subdivision application but <br />the final plat cannot be presented for Council ’s formal and final action until the registration of <br />the property is completed. If Council conceptually approves the proposed realignment of lot <br />lines, applicant may proceed with the necessary steps to complete the subdivision, file a lot area <br />variance for the undeveloped lot and commence registration of remaining property. If Council <br />denies proposed lot line rearrangement, applicant may file a lot area variance for the existing <br />lot at .78 acres. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Should shared lot line be readjusted at northwest comer of proposed Lot 2 so that <br />existing garage meets 10’ side yard setback? <br />2.Upon review of the topographic information, does the newly proposed division line <br />reflect limitations of physical boundaries? <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />The Planning Commission ’s recommendation of approval must include the following <br />conditions: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />Application cannot be presented for Council ’s action until registration of abstract <br />lands is finalized. <br />Designation of drainage and utility easements 10’ wide along the perimeter <br />property lines of both lots and 5 ’ along the interior. <br />Realignment of side lot line so that existing garage can meet 10’ side setback -- <br />any other changes to reflect topographic natural boundaries of properties? <br />Isv
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.