Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1897 <br />Febfuar> 15. 1994 <br />Pace 2 <br />Review of Amended Application <br />Applicants have submitted a revised plan with exact location of 929.4 elevation at Maxwell Bay. <br />Note setback from Maxwell Bay shoreline for addition is now shown at 52*. As long as a 50* <br />minimum setback is maintained, the DNH woulu take no issue w ith the 52’ setback. Applicants <br />note the addition has been reduced in square footage proposed at 650 s f. (original 760 s.f.). <br />Applicants note that the size of the garage addition is a standard size for a two stall garage with <br />additional storage (24’ x 26’ = 624 s.f.). <br />There is a reduction of 107 s.f. of driveway hardcover (175 s.f. - 68 s.f. of new- drive, see <br />Exhibit F) resulting from drivew'ay area to be removed and driveway area to be covered by <br />portion of new structure. Applicants have offered to remove 300 s.f. of backout apron. Staff <br />once again would ask that a backout apron be provided because of the length of the single <br />driveway. <br />Applicants are willing to remove overhangs along the side of the structure facing the channel so <br />that there is ik) further encroachment of the substandard yard area and would agree to limit <br />overhang to 1 1/2’ along the side and front of garage. If maintained at 1 1/2’, there would be <br />no impact on hardcover or structural coverage. A normal lot with 46.000 s.f. would be allowed <br />6.900 s.f. or 15% structural coverage. Total improvement would result in 2.447 s.f. or 5.3% <br />structural coverage. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Is the reduction of garage addition adequate? Original 760 s.f. Proposed 650 s.f. <br />2. Should the struemre be reduced in length to minimize encroachment of Maxwell Bay <br />shoreline now shown at a 52’ setback. Note a 65’ setback was approved in 1983 <br />variance review. Review Exhibit C. this may have resulted from faulty topographic <br />information. <br />3.Is a 1.13% increase in hardcover too excessive for this propert)' now proposed at 10.9fS? <br />Structural coverage is proposed at 5.3% <br />Options of Action <br />Approval as propiosed or amended. <br />Any recommendation of approval must include the condition that hardcover scheduled for <br />removal must be completed prior to the final inspection for the new construction.