My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
11-20-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2023 10:44:03 AM
Creation date
10/5/2023 8:44:35 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
S£P.*2r95(THUI 13:36 PRNA TEL:612635Q680 P.005 <br />’n <br />o - > <br />ooncludM that a larga portion of mf lot la not actually a <br />watland. A nap is Includad In tha raport to show tha actual adga of tha wetland. <br />In tha area that is a watland beyond 75 faat of tha <br />I ramovad tan trees. This was a saall fraction of tha trees <br />remain on ay property. l astloata that there are 200-300 <br />"y property. The removal of these tan trees did not <br />any drainage problem or in any way change the contour of the land. <br />My lot is covered by a September 20, 1978 "riowage and <br />Conservation Caseaent and Waiver of Damages” entered into between <br />the City and prior developers of my lot and adjoining lots. <br />2)b) of that Easement states that the City must consent <br />to the resK>val of any trees from my lot. <br />Unfortunately, when I bought my home in June, 1999 the <br />sellers represented that there were no restrictive easesMnts and <br />®y title insurance company did not pick up the fact that this <br />easement had been recorded whan it Issued my title insurance <br />policy. Therefore, Z was completely unaware that this sgrmmment <br />Z respectfully request that the City consent to the <br />removal of these trees from the wetland area. <br />>«K>val of trees within 75 feet of Lake: <br />I also removed ten trees that were within 75 feet of <br />Lake Minnetonka. All had a diameter greater than six inches. <br />Section 10.22 Subd. 3 states that the City's consent to <br />the removal of trees in this area is required and that such <br />consent will require replacement trass of a sise and nature <br />acceptable to the staff. <br />I have no good excuse for removing these ten trees. I <br />was assured by a neighbor that there were no restrictions and it <br />appeared to me to have been done by others in the area. Z <br />certainly did not believe that Z was doing anything against the <br />City's ordinances, but in retrospect, i should have c*>ecked with the City's staff. <br />Z propose to replace these ten trees with the help of a <br />tree expert, fxnding the best species and locations for these <br />replaced trees. I have been advised that the best procedure for <br />me to follow to determine tha best locations for the trees is to <br />winter when the foliage and uzMlergrowth are gone and <br />then detexeine where to place the trees. <br />Z would propose to plant ten trees next spring after <br />having the locations approved by staff, i would like to plant a
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.