11-20-1995 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINI TE;S OE TEEEi ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION ME ETING Ell I DON NOVEMBE R 20. IW5 (#13 - Richard Miller - Continued) There were no public coniniems Ejndquist moved, E(awn seconded, to approve Application #2089 with the hardships listed and with noting the zoning at the time of purchase Vote Ayes 5. Nays 0 (#14) #2091 BI RTON SCOTT BALU 1065 KERNDALE ROAD WEST - VARIANCES - PCBEIC HEARING - 11:15-11:25 P.M. The Certificate of Mailinti and /Vlfidavit of Ehiblication were noted. The Applicant was present GatTron repoiled that the existing residence is mainly located within the 75’ zone with a deck on the lakeside There is also a 4’ overhang on the house GatTron said the request is for a bay w indow abov e the dcxrk and under the overhang but within the 4' of the overhang at 3' This application would involve the expansion of one bay w indow and the addition of tw o more GatTron commented thi; the hardcover is significant on this property The proposal could increase the encroachment to the lakeside by 3*. The west end is 47* from the lake At midpoint, the residence is M 5' from the lake On the east end, the residence is 45' from the lake Hardcover exists in the 0-75’ zone at 36 8%, 41 4® o in the 75-250’ zone, and conforms in the 250-500’ zone at I3.6?« The overall hardcover exists at 36. l® a. The DNR recommends hardcover for an entire property at 25® b Gafi'ron noted that the tennis court located in the driveway has appeared since 1991. In comparison with a .»ur\ ey submitted by the previous owner for a previous application, the driveway and court have expanded He noted the rock and plastic along the house but commented that it is narrower in width than the 4’ overhang but still considered hardcover GalT'^on brought two questions before the Planning Commissioners for their consideration. Should the bay windows be approved allowing a fuHher encroachment of 3 ’ and should approval be tied to the hardcover. Peterson commented that there was the perception of more encroachment but was not really closer when considenng the ov erhang. GafTron suggested that the bulk of the house was getting closer to the lake, and the proposal did add more structure in the 0-75’ zone. While the overhang was more of an encnvachment, the addition to the bulk requires for need for the variances.