Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2059 <br />September 15, 1995 <br />Page 5 <br />Staff Recommendation <br />u r » for Planning Commission review and consideration. <br />Folic wmg IS a punch list of items f L in attendance at Monday night ’s meeting <br />Watershed District representatives are expect sclow are addressed in the attachedto address any issues of concern. Many of the issues noted below are addresseo in <br />materials. <br />justification? <br />does Planning Commission accept the revegetation plan as adequate. <br />Is the project necessary or are there alternatives? <br />u c MrWD adeauately addressed mitigation of weUand per Wetland <br />subwatershed? <br />From a safety standpoint for the finished pond, does Planning Conmission comu <br />tot the access road should be gated? Does Planning Commission •>?« “V <br />^ncems regarding the potential for this area to become an attraenve nuisance . <br />Ate there any concerns of the property owners, Mr. and Mrs. Pierce, that the <br />City should be aware of and address? <br />The following questions and possible concerns relate specificaUy » 0* constniction process: <br />.. ,<..iin. fnrees traffic from this winter's Deer HiU Road project on to the <br />often, and may have specific comments . . . <br />Sro ”^r.7nm «P^ afrer one year, but extend to the expected start <br />• • X ■ m t-S I m Mur