My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
11-20-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2023 10:44:03 AM
Creation date
10/5/2023 8:44:35 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ME mT jTES of the ORONO planning CONCS-flSSION <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 18. 1995 <br />(#5 - #2059 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District - Continued) <br />Pearce felt it would be to the City's interest to include conditions in the a^eement <br />between Orono and the MCWT). A summary of these condiuons were ^ <br />Commission members. The conditions are intended to reduce the vfrvvT> <br />be restorative of the area. Fontaine said there has been difficulty wth the MC <br />complying with timely notice to Pearce wiffi regards to revision ot o^ ^ pan <br />thru on design elements. He believes it is in the best interest or t e -_/?„p]ain the <br />of their review an artist's rendition of the area showing the revegetation, expl^n he <br />differences between the specifications and what the MCWD is doing, on <br />is necessary for the MCWD to spell out the maintenance requirements with who g <br />what, w^paying, and on what schedule. Specific recommendanons were given m the <br />handout for such maintenance. <br />Schroeder commented that the project was complicated and asked jL <br />has bora due to the project. Pearce indicated engineenns costs have ran $85,000. and the <br />easement will only trover about $20,000. Schroeder noted that the <br />report will have a positive influence on the project It wtu flso hjs bebet ^ <br />TOeting is required for the Commission to look over the findings, especially in baht of the <br />time and cost consideration Pearce has given to the project. <br />LaBotinty said the project began in 1988. It was originally proposed w totally P'»“ <br />in Medina, then was changed to two ponds in Long Lake, then changiM to include the <br />Pearce pond and DeerhiU, and now to include Long Lake, Medina, and Orono. The <br />phosphLs reduction amounts have remained the same. LaBotinty potmrt out d no <br />agreement can be acquired on the DeerhiU Road pond, the projert would be back to a 5- <br />acre pond on the Pearce property. <br />LaBounty asked, regarding the 7 engineering findings, that while 1-5 met <br />aooroval #6 LaBountv would like the agency to be treated as would any other federal <br />aflCTCV bn #7, the special conditions under which haulmg can be stopped. L^oumy s^d <br />^es^ be imposed on the contractor. He further noted no fertilizer would be <br />tree removal has been taken care of To control erosion, LaBounty said the slope down to <br />the pond would be 4:1 with a 6:1 slope out of the pond. <br />Ptterson moved, Schroeder seconded, to table the application. <br />Fontaine noted that LaBounty has only recently taken over the project for the MCWD and <br />has done a good job with communicating with Pearce. <br />Schroeder asked that copies be made of the Barr report for the Commissioners. <br />Smith thanked Mr. Pearce for his time and cost considerations he has taken.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.