My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
11-20-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2023 10:44:03 AM
Creation date
10/5/2023 8:44:35 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUIts OF THF: ORONO PLANMN(i COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 20, 1W5 <br />(#12 - #2084 Thomas McCune - Continued) <br />Lindquist received confirmation to his question that the septic system is located under the <br />proposed garage McCune noted that all 8 homeowners in the area signed up for sewer <br />which is hoped will rKCur next year The plan is to wait to do the improsements until the <br />sewer is completed This is part of the whole plan <br />Hawn moved, Berg seconded, to approve Application #2084 with the reservation that the <br />project not proceed with the garage construction until municipal sewer is available <br />There were no public comments. <br />Vote: Aves 5, Navs 0. <br />(#11) #2086 ROBERT AND JAMCE CALLAN^ 2915 SOMERSET LANE - <br />CONDITIONAL I SE PERMIT,V ARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - 10:32-10:59 <br />P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication w ere noted. <br />The Applicant was present <br />Mabusth reported th,.t the application was for a conditional use permit and variance to <br />create a 6000 s f r>pen water area in a designated wetland of 1 acre si/e The property <br />would have over 2 acres of dry contiguous buildable land Mabusth noted that the City <br />has a conservation and fiowage easement over the are? <br />Mabusth reviewed the codes, specifically 10.55 where amendments would be needed, and <br />10 56 which lists the functional entities that all wetlands provide and should retain. Of the <br />6 functional qualities listed, Mabusth said there would be no impact on #5, regarding <br />shoreline or bank stabilization, but had no information on #3, regarding fish and wildlife <br />habitat. Mabusth said the issue is that the code discourages having anv prohibition in code <br />10.55. <br />Mabusth said the City Engineer and DNR had no problem with the proposal as tong as <br />certain standards were met Replacement would be asked for base and bank levels (2.25 <br />acres). The type 2 wetlands should be replaced for wildlife habitat. Mabusth said she saw <br />a problem with other residents of the 7 residential lots in the area asking for the same type <br />of pond The application was being reviewed by the DNR and MCWD <br />Mark Gronberg said he checked with Kristen George, who is awaiting City ’s decision. <br />George was said to have no problem with the excavation in the wetland. He noted that <br />the Corp of Engineers still needed to approve the application. He also noted that the <br />wetland has become larger after losing the farming in the area. <br />2.1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.