Laserfiche WebLink
• *. • <br />ynSUTES OF THE LAKE USE COMMTrTEE - March 24, 1993 <br />• nmnn The DNR currently docs not have enough funding to <br />s;“£l5S;SSSSiEE!“r^ siii <br />Goenea thought the resideats ui Callahan thought it might he easier to close at <br />City could dose it for some Closing should be dene with signage and <br />10:00 p.m. rather than not °P‘^ ' Bdlows'asked if a gate could be considered <br />not plowing would effecuvely close it m the ^ bubblers, this is unsafe m <br />at me ramp as previously disc^sed^ discussed in the Maxwell Bay group, <br />the winter. The winter snowmobile problem na <br />,.„.rmatr« <br />how these are mainuined and enforced would be an issue. <br />Gaffron noted the DtfR doesn't wuId°^^*of*lt for them except <br />agreement either with the City or narking lot This was mentioned at the Cou^ smee <br />sr.SJs.r. s —n: rjsr.5- <br />KeUey noted the City is actually losing wo wm wSlly <br />He feels this access is for non-Orono ^ L the Orono residents. If we have <br />te from Orono. Therefore, these costs should not be b^ W ^ ^ budget <br />an agreement with the DNR. funds shw Hennepin County residents <br />KeUey would expect most of the use ^ doesn’t solve the problem of lost tax <br />nuvbe the County should maintain the site. Tlut sou <br />revenue (S8,000/year) and costs of poUemg.