Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />J. <br />I. Traffic Pattern and Layout (see sketch) <br />A. On-site <br />1. Traffic fiow should be designated as one-way throughout the site. This <br />mav result in the need for a mid-site crossover to acccmLiiOdatw auto o > <br />m <br />traffic. <br />2. Two curb cuts should be developed, the most southerly desigMted <br />"Entrance Onlv" and the most northerly "Exit Only". The purpose of <br />is to increase exiting sight distance for car-traUer traffic leavmg the site. <br />Consider a barrier (or striping) across the mouth of the ramp backup <br />waiting area to eiimiiiate short circuiting. <br />4 We’ve received mixed reviews regarding striping the three ramp lanes and <br />the use of make-ready docks within the ramp. Please give us some <br />background regarding the ramp width, striping of ramp lanes versus not <br />stripin-, your e.xperience with the use of docks between the ramp lanes, <br />and generally a shon overview of how you e.xpect this ramp to ftmeuon. <br />5 Given a positive e.xperience with back-in car-traUer parking partially on <br />orass at North Arm Landing, we would suggest strongly that the southwest <br />foop be omined. and this area as well as the remamder of the south row be <br />re-^<^led for car-trailer back-in parking with surmountable swale and^s <br />for traders; also consider widening these parking spaces (but may still end <br />up with additional total spaces!). This should also reduce hardcover... <br />We fe-1 that the lane between the middle and southerly parking blocks <br />shouWbe widened if possible, especially to help accomot^te ^ar- <br />trailer parking. The proposal shows approximately 25 ; could it be <br />widened up to 40? <br />n Off site - We have real concerns about how this project may affect traffic flows <br />“■ area would expect DNR to work with Hennepin County ^ City <br />to develop a suiiable plan to address them. Our concerns mclude: <br />1. <br />2. <br />We agree fully with the stacking right turn lane for westbound County <br />T\oad 51. <br />A. hv-nass lane will need to be developed (as part of this proj«t) for <br />esstbound County Road 51 to accommodate left turning car-traders h^g <br />on Tonka^ to the access. We are concerned about stac^ of <br />e^ound overflow traffic ftom North Arm Landing waiting to get into the <br />Maxwell Bay Access. <br />1