My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-16-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
10-16-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2023 2:42:56 PM
Creation date
10/4/2023 2:29:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
470
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 16, 1995 <br />(#7 - #2061 Ame Wasberg - Continued) <br />Mabusth reported that the new owners of the property have filed to renew the original <br />variance application. Peterson asked Mr. Wa^rg why he would wish to do so. Wasberg <br />said he purchased the house in February of 1995 and wants to refurbish the house. In <br />order to do so, it would require a variance. This renewal would allow him time to develop <br />apian. <br />Mabusth noted that the applicant has removed all of underhner hardcover on the property. <br />It was noted that the 2-story improvement was not to encroach the lagoon any further <br />than existing structures. The approval included a deck. The applicant has advised that <br />they would like to remove the existing driveway at North Shore Drive and relocate a new <br />access at the existing driveway to the south. They would plant evergreens along North <br />Shore Drive to provide a landscape buffer to the noise and activities on the county road. <br />Mabusth further added that the applicant’s plan was improvements to the home would not <br />be as ambitious as that of the previous owner. <br />Schroeder moved, Hawn seconded, to approve Application #2061 because it had been <br />approved in the past. Even if changes were made, Schroeder noted the changes would be <br />to the better. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Vote. Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#8) #2065 MR. & MRS. SAMUEL MARFIELD, 2455 SCOTCH PINE LANE/MR. <br />& MRS. H. DOUGLAS HILL, 2425 DOUGLAS PINE LANE/WILLIAM TOLES, <br />2435 SCOTCH PIN^* LANE - VACATION OF SCOTCH PINE LANE, <br />VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS, PRELIMINARY <br />SUBDIVISION (REPLAT) - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 8:31-8:58 <br />P.M. <br />The Applicants were present. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.