10-16-1995 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUN'E 19, 1995 X («) #3031 BRUCE R. KELLY .AND IRMA J. KELLY, 2340 FOX STREET - PRELEVfINARY Sl^DIVlSION - 8:30-S;45 P*>L The CertiScate of Mailing and AfSda\-ii of Publication were noted. Mr. & Mrs Kelly were present. The propem- m quest.on is located at ti intersection o.Tox Street and Wi»ow Dnve in a RRIB zone requiring Z acre minimum lot size and _ acres ot conuguous land The applicants propose a shared access at the easting curb cut. svhich has been approved bv the Engineer. Mabusth cautioned the owner that the dnveway easement would have an impaa on division of Lot I in the future. The ^ea of must be excluded from dry land area. It was noted that the top ot the hill the east side of the new lot was an acceptable location. Mabusth said there was a problem with the septic testing. The existing septic system serving residence is located on Lot 2 and would not meet current septic standards Mabusth noted there appears to be no problem with the sepuc sites on the Staff is unable to locate the sites because the septic diagrams are not to sc^e. They need to be redrawn to scale. .Mabusth said new septic testing needs to be developed lot and a preliminary survey. An additional 5' is needed to have 200 of lot width to the rear of the 50' street setback. The AppUcant said both lots were over 200' wide. KeUy did not underst^d that the easement area is deducted from the dry buildabic. The reason for the subdivision is to ^d a reuremcat-P.pe home on the other lot. KeUy said the lot line was not necessarily fixed, but he only wanted to make it easy and simple. KeUy understands that two new scptics are needed and cited a report saying there is adequate space on both lots for mound systems He does not understand the need for tabling the appbcation. Rowlette commented that the survey identifies the property. Kelly was certified. Rowlette said she could not approve the applicauon without 200 on Fox Street for the new lot. Mabusth said structures need to be located in the field and setbacks confirmed from a fixed lot line, and the locating of structures through topograpical mapping does not satisfy requirements ot a preliminary plat. Schroeder said althoueh the Commission can not act on the application, direction can be given. Schroder noted ’that the septic seems to meet die requirements. Rowlette said caution was needed so as not to destroy a fiiture subdiMSion. Peterson moved. Nolan seconded, to table AppUcation ??2031 for City review of the septic sites and for a survey pinpointing structures and weUs. Ayes 7. Nays 0.