Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 16, 1995 <br />(#4 - #2041 Phil and Darcy Otto - Continued) <br />Schroeder inquired and received confirmation that Sauer had no further objections. Otto <br />said he has not spoken with Sauer since the last meeting. The owner to the east, <br />according to Otto, has given his approval of the plan as he has not responded to Staffs <br />letter. <br />Lindquist asked if the applicant was still parking his boat on the curb cut. The applicant <br />said he stores the boat off site. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Lindquist moved, Berg seconded, to approve Application #2041 for an after-the-fact <br />conditional use permit with Staff recommendations 1-4 and final grading approved by the <br />City Engineer. The owner is to arrange for inspections by the City Engineer before <br />seeding and after seeding. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#5) #2056 MICHAEL AND BARBARA WIGLEY, 1035 TONKAWA ROAD - <br />VAIUANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC <br />HEARING 8:19-8:28 P.M. <br />The applicants were represented by landscaper. Matt Laue. <br />Gaffron reported that the proposal has been revised. The initial proposal was for a <br />retaining wall located at the base of the slope with fill behind it. Another boulder wall was <br />to be constructed at the top of the hill with grading and fill to flatten out the area. The <br />property has a steep bank to the lakeshore. The house on the property is fairly new. <br />There are presently 3:1 and 2:1 slopes. The applicants are concerned with poison ivy on <br />the slopes. Gaflfon reported that the Planning Commission has previously rejected the <br />idea of grading to eliminate the poison ivy. Planning Commission suggested elimination of <br />the lower boulder wall. <br />Gaffron asked Laue about the drain tile found on the property. Laue said it begins on the <br />upper stair to the front and exits by a tree. He sees no function for the tile and feels <br />grading above the slope will do a better job in eliminating erosion. <br />Another issue of concern was with the portion of the 0-75* area lined with fabric covered <br />by mulch. Gaffron said this was hardcover but there may be a good reason for the <br />material to exist. There are no hardcover calculations for the property. If approval is <br />recommended, hardcover calculations will be needed for the existing and proposed walls <br />and fabric. The only other existing hardcover in the 0-75* is the stairs and tops of <br />boulders.