My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-16-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
10-16-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2023 2:42:56 PM
Creation date
10/4/2023 2:29:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
470
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Memorandum <br />_________________ <br />,fr -- ^ <br />SER 2.6 “'5 <br />612/370-0700 <br />Fii 612/370-1378 <br />Denver <br />Milwauketf <br />Minneapolis <br />Orlando <br />Phoenix <br />Portlar.ii <br />San Dieeo <br />Seattle <br />B R W LNC DATE:September 21, 1995 <br />Planning <br />Transportation <br />Eng*in««nrg <br />TO:Mike Gaffron <br />City of Orono <br />.'\ssistant Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Urban Design <br />FROM:Dale Beckmann <br />Thresher square <br />700 ThirJ Street So <br />Minneapolis. <br />\L\ 55415 <br />RE:Proposed SCOTCH PINE ADDITION <br />Orono Zoning File ? 2C65 <br />Street Vacation/Fire Protection Issues <br />By way of introduction, I am a vice-president at BRVC^ with approximately 30 years <br />of experience in engineering and development work. 1 was als6 the Assistant Fire <br />Chief for the City of Inver Grove Heights for 6 years and the Fire Chief in that <br />City for an additional 9 years. I have extensive experience in both engineering and <br />site design activities and in firefighting and tire protection issues as well. <br />I understand that, based upon review of your staff report for the above referenced <br />project, there may be concern both on the City's part and the Long Lake Fire <br />Department's part with respea to potential Life Safety and Property Protection <br />issues ii the project vacating the existing street is app,.j»c.a. <br />I have reviewed both your report and the site maps prepared by our office in <br />analyzing this issue. I would offer the following comments regarding these issues. <br />• The current roadway layout requires a "Dump and Go" operation. The <br />"first-in " engine would drop a hose (large diameter) at North Shore Drive <br />and lavout hose up to the residence. The engine company would utilize its <br />water tank (5CC - 1,CCC gal) for an initial attack of a fire. <br />A second engine or a tanker would connect to the hose at North Shore <br />Drive and pump water to the first engine to continue to fight the fire.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.