My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-1996 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
02-13-1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2023 4:14:42 PM
Creation date
10/3/2023 4:12:37 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />" y <br />/ <br />DATE: Febtuai^i^ '* <br />ITEM NO.: ^ <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Jeanne A. Mabusih <br />Title Building & Zoning Administrator <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #1988 Kenneth J. and Eileen F. Severinson, 2800 Shadywood Road <br />Variances - Resolution <br />Zoning District: LR-IB <br />Approximate area = 39,000 s.f. (majority of property is located within 0-75 setback area at <br />approximately 29,500 s.f. <br />Description of Request <br />Please refer to the staff memo dated 1-9-95 and the minutes of the meeting for more background <br />on the review of this application. <br />Tlie applicant installed new sections of 6-7’ privacy fence and repaired other sections of fencing <br />without the benefit of a building permit review. At the time of the building permit review prior <br />to construction, staff would have advised of the need for variance approvals. The fencing runs <br />along the channel and adjacent to the County street yard. The Code would allow privacy fencing <br />along the County road or street lot line of the lakeshore lot but the majority of the street yard <br />of this property is located within the 0-75 ’ setback area. In fact, the entire fence is located <br />within the 0-75 ’ setback area. Applicant notes he was completely unaware that a building permit <br />would be necessary to reinstall the fencing. <br />Please review Exhibit A-1 that notes the unique findings and hardships to support the variance <br />request. They are reviewed as followed: <br />1 The Narrows Channel is a heavily trafficked channel connecting the lower lake <br />and the upper lake. There is a need for both a visual and noise buffer from the <br />boat traffic and sounds of boaters that pass through the channel. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />The channel is heavily trafficked both in the summer by boaters and the winter <br />by snowmobilers. <br />Many private properties along the channel within the City of Orono have similar <br />privacy fencing. <br />Elimination of the fence could potentially result in the reduction of the value of <br />the property.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.