Laserfiche WebLink
Bonestroo <br />Rosene <br />Anderllk & <br />Associates <br />Engineers & Architects <br />Qonnttoa Aucnf. Anjfrm 4na Assoo^cex Inc 9 Af^rmsuyf Aevon^^Oij9 Opoonunfy Cmpa^ <br />Ooo O SorrMioa <br />•cDfi wir ioif^ • <br />joitph C Aroet < f f <br />L $ofv*« !■€ <br />w'e^'* * Cco*i •£ <br />l*>ur»«i i Nwyn ^1 <br />•oM't G khuhcht Pi <br />Suwr M C PA <br />•Sf" C' <br />A •£ <br />«r A oe^o^ Pi <br />ioon t •Vtrt <br />•iC'ec vir Poite* p! <br />Otv« O ovou. *r <br />■tJO#*t C P-1*ek A A <br />j^7 A 9c-%;::n •• <br />V#»« A H^rign f C <br />Vicr>j# T AeutTrenn P| <br />JK E P£ <br />T*iQr^J • A'KTf W"' AiA <br />00%*^ C <br />"^rofTMi A S/fca Pi <br />J kriACv PS <br />v^er Ft <br />MThiti p me »f <br />Agnn M tlAg. AiC • <br />W PFiC’ysn, H <br />C Lync-, Pi <br />jpmfs t Ml JTil PI <br />0 AfW' PC <br />kCtt J A^gerte »f <br />Uprren p AAoenor P| <br />Mjr% p PCTL Af <br />vpre A SP»[V p? <br />Gpt/ \Ar Mo'»*“ Pi <br />J Qpnnoi-. A*A <br />34^'e* J eggeno*' pi <br />A IKA Icinwo; PC <br />P*» ‘.o J • PC <br />Mjrt 0 PC <br />V ti t P| <br />L PTtio Gra^ PS. <br />«4»rA L. pf <br />CryO KnttC^O *C <br />KPTA t nap Pf <br />D0w>4l : ttAO< PS <br />c ouujnoA pf <br />Ctc%o C'<vEf pf <br />p»ii' 0 M«UP* pf <br />JCf r F OorOPf. P| <br />CV'TS A C'Ynjor <br />tec M <br />Nj*vr M O'w' <br />JA*^ • f <br />0 <br />January 11, 1995 <br />Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, <br />Building and Zoning Administrator <br />City of Orono <br />Post Office Box 6t <br />Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323 <br />Re: Yorks Residence <br />File No. 139-gen <br />Dear Jeanne, <br />On January 5th we inspected the completed retaining wall at the Yorks residence at 2825 Casco <br />Point Road. Neither the applicant or the contractor contacted the City for inspection prior to <br />or during construction. TTie height of the completed wall is two to five feet taller than shown <br />on the approved plans. The plans show 4-feet of exposed wall. We had noted In our previous <br />reviews that ”if the height of the wall changes at any time during construction, additional <br />geogrid must be included for support of the wall.” The contractor should provide information <br />confirming that additional layers and depth of geogrid were used to construct the wall due to <br />the increased height. Other aspects shown on the approved plans that should have been <br />inspected include: <br />• bond beam (bridged) construction in front of existing trees <br />• granular backfill in bridged areas <br />- 14 inches of buried block (18 inches required at increased height) <br />The contractor should provide the City with photographs taken during construction, revised <br />plans showing changes in design and any other information that would document what steps <br />were taken to reinforce the wall at the increased height. Because the wall was not constructed <br />in accordance with the approved plans, the contractor should provide the City with a letter <br />confirming this fact. <br />Please contact me at this office If you have any questions regarding this matter. <br />Yours very truly, <br />BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. <br />Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. <br />cc: Dave Siockdale. Edgework Builders, Inc. <br />2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN SSI 13 • 612-636-4600