Laserfiche WebLink
V * <br />IL appropriate reglxatory vehicle <br />TTie second issue that comes to mind as I review the proposed amendments U whether <br />iU not C^ge fromly to day. For instance, the type of busing to be conductei <br />'^cuSd“id‘*e “sL°ofTart goals'wWch cm oS^ be <br />mols available to ty ^ „se penults allow a City to designate certam types of <br />Sd .L" wIL'a district bLed upon the appUcanfs satisfaction of ceruin <br />Standards and criteria articulated by ordinance. <br />iKe. of land that ini«>ht change from day to day. on the other hand, need not be Uses of land tn « include the specific activities that are conducted on <br />regulated by the zoning code. Su jit. the general nature of the <br />SC “ oXtd."™^^^ <br />reguIaL tluough a Uce.nsing scheme pursuant to the City s pohce powers, <br />is nothing'improper about including “ *““'^§Sve°“thrCi^ more flexibility in <br />E£St srrorg isi/:^toSShr"v <br />licensing provisions.) <br />CONCLUSION <br />I hope Lhis informadon is helpful. 1 would be happy to come »« <br />visit with me Planning Commission as it considers these amendments. Please let me know <br />how you would like to proceed. <br />cc; Thomas J. Barrett <br />219/22051413 7/22/94