My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-18-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
09-18-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2023 2:43:28 PM
Creation date
9/28/2023 4:30:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
647
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEET ING HELD ON SEFFEMDER 18, 1995 <br />(#16 - #2073 William and Susan Dunklcy - Ccmtinucd) <br />The appheani said there were two areas where rock could be taken exit and add grass and <br />still do the breezeway as proposed Any other areas could make it difficult to maintain <br />with the slope of the lot Schroeder said the rock renK>val should be <k>ne. and he would <br />not approve an\ additional structure <br />Rowlene asked to look at what could be done with tl» dri\*ew-ay The applicant said a <br />sidewalk was eliminated, and the new driveway replaced whai was there already <br />Rowlette added that the terdcover calculations arc then higher than what is listed. <br />Schroeder asked if any of the poured drivcw ay could be *^emoved <br />Smith questioned how alt the hardcover was approved when 25% is allowed and 74?'» <br />exists in the 75-250’ zone (iaffron noted that he had advised the entry addition contractor <br />that applicants should not redo the driveway as the Planning Commission would not look <br />favora^ upon new hardcover appearing during a hardcover variance review, but it was <br />completed without a permit <br />Schroeder moved. Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #2073 limited to the <br />replacement of the retaining walls by the rfioreline, retaining w all and step along the <br />garage, and to repair the retaining wall along the driveway. <br />There were no public comments <br />Hawn questioned whether the entry could be added without the addition of any more lot <br />coverage. The stoop was noted to be a permanent part of the house as it covers the weO <br />pit and is included in the perimeter of the house It was a^ed that the overhang not <br />exceed 4' <br />Schroeder said he would amend his motion to allow the entry due to the existing water <br />problems with the condition that 2x the amount of hardcover would be eliminated <br />elsewhere and all rock and plastic be removed No screened porch or new deck would be <br />allowed Lindquist second^ After further discussion, (jaftron noted on the site plan the <br />areas where hardcover is recommended to be removed. <br />Gaflron noted receipt of letters from neighbors voicing their approval of the application. <br />Vote; Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />1 i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.