Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2059 <br />September 15, 1995 <br />Page 5 <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Following is a punch list of items for Planning Commission review and consideration. <br />Watersh^ District representatives are expected to be in attendance at Monday night s meeting <br />to address any issues of concern. Many of the issues noted below are addressed in the attached <br />materials. <br />• Are the iKcessary variances in regards to tree removal vegetation clearing and <br />excavation within 75’ of a tributary supported by adequate hardships and <br />justification? <br />• Are the benefits to water quality in Long Lake provided by this project sufficient <br />to balance the loss of vegetation, habitat, etc.? From an aesthetic standpoint, <br />does plannin g Commission accept the revegetation plan as adequate? <br />• Is the project necessary or are there alternatives? <br />• Has MCWD adequately addressed mitigation of wetland per Wetlairf <br />Conservation Act guidelines? Is mitigation for the loss of Tyj» 2/7 wetland in <br />Orono going to be mitigated in Orono. or at least within the upstream <br />subwatershed? <br />• From a safety standpoint for the finished pond, does Planning Commission concur <br />that the access road should be gated? Does Planning Commission have any <br />concerns regarding the potential for this area to become an "attractive nuisance"? <br />• Are there any concerns of the property owners, Mr. and Mrs. Pierce, that the <br />City should aware of and address? <br />The following questions and possible concerns relate specifically to the construction process: <br />• If Medina forces traffic from this winter ’s Deer Hill Road project on to the <br />Tamarack/County Road 6 intersection, how will MCWD address safety concerns? <br />While this is not strictly a planning issue related to the County Road 6 project. <br />Chairman Peterson lives at the northwest quadrant of this intersection, and other <br />Commission members live within a short distance of this area and use this road <br />often, and may have specific comments . . . <br />• Regarding the County Road 6 project scheduled for 1997/1998, does Planning <br />Commission concur with staff that the conditional use permit/variance resolution <br />should be written to not expire after one year, but extend to the expected start