Laserfiche WebLink
KILNUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COmflSSION <br />MEETING HEl DON SEPTEMBER 18. IW5 <br />(#5 - <^2059 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District - Continued) <br />Rowlette questioned item A on the handout and asked uhat would happen it'the Medina <br />project WHS not completed prior to the Orono project LaBounty said it would be <br />suificiem to condition Orono’s approval on the completion of the Deerhill Road prefect. <br />LaBounty said !w would furnish an anist's remlition of the revegetation and wiU meet with <br />Pearce. <br />Vote Ayes 6. Nays 0 <br />The Planning Commissioners asked to schedule a joint meeting with the Council regarding <br />this project <br />(#6) 1^2060 TIM FCYO AND KAREN FVLLER-FEYO, 4055 ELM STREET > <br />VARIANCE RENEWAL - PLBUC HEARING 9:40-9:55 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Gaffron noted that the qjplication was for a renewal of a lot area variance previously <br />granted in 1978, 1980, 1994 The property is located in the LR-IB single family <br />iakeshore residential zoning district requiring 1 acre on Elm Street, west of Tonkawa. A <br />54% variance for lot area is requested for the 46 acre lot. The lot meets the lot width <br />requirement as it contains 118’or 84% of the 140^ standard, where 80% or 112* is required <br />for existing lots of record. <br />Gaffron reported that the three lots were combined into one parcel and received approval <br />of a conceptual fwtprint in 1994 with 10' side setback, 30' near, and 35 ’ front setback. <br />The grading plan showing the driveway meets the satisfaction of the Engineer. Concern <br />with the grading is from direct runoff traveling downhJi. A proposed downspout and <br />underground tile w ill direct drainage to the road ditch at *he front of the lot, from which it <br />flows to North Arm <br />Peterson received confirmation that there are no changes to the application, and it is a <br />renewal application only. Peterson inquired of the applicant if it was their Intention to do <br />anything with the properly Feyo said it is their intention to sell or build. The Feyo's are <br />in the process of securing loans. It was noted that the shed belonging to the neighbor is <br />still located on the Feyo property. <br />Schroeder inquired if there was a lot line problem. Gaffron said the shed still exists over <br />the lot line and the neighbors still disagree Schroeder asked that the lot line be located <br />and stipulate the location of the shed.