Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2000 <br />September 12, 1995 <br />Exhibit N <br />Exhibit O <br />Exhibit P <br />Exhibit Q <br />Exhibit R <br />Exhibit S <br />- Cloutier to Barrett letter April 12, 1995 <br />- Barrett to Cloutier lener April 20, 1995 <br />- Cloutier to Barrett letter June 27, 1995 <br />- Barrett to Cloutier letter June 28, 1995 <br />- Cloutier to Orono staff letter August 28, 1995 <br />- Original staff memo for March 20, 1995 meeting of the Planning <br />Commission <br />Status of Application <br />At the March 20th meeting of the Planning Commission, applicant asked to table all review of <br />the simple division application to allow applicant additional time to review other issues raised <br />with the possible subdivision of Lot 3 from the original homestead parcel. Lot 4. It is also the <br />obligation of the city to advise the applicant of all code issues that may impact this property with <br />the division of one of the three lots now legally combined as one. <br />Many of the issues raised by both staff and Planning Commission members with the future <br />division of Lot 3 are no longer a concern for applicant as he will remain the owner of Lots 3 <br />and 4 and his son wUl own Lot 1. If Lot 3 is to be divided at some fumre date, based on the <br />standards of the code at that time, the applicant’s son may be asked to join in that subdivision <br />if needed. <br />Exhibits N through R, the leners between the City Attorney and applicant have been enclosed <br />for your information. The concern of the applicant was the issue of legal combination of the