Laserfiche WebLink
I • •■f • <br />temple ASSOCIATES me; <br />V <br />•■.!v •• • . <br />n*y li, 1919 <br />Mr. SajB Marficld <br />2455 Scotch Pin* Z.*n* <br />Wayz*tJi« Minnesota 55391 <br />REt Utility Easement <br />Orono/ Mimiasota <br />Dear Mr. Marfialdt <br />In response to your questions concerning the future utilisation <br />of the utility easement east of your property. I have the folloif- <br />ing COfiBBOntSI <br />1.The easement could accoRBoodate sewer lines servicing <br />the approximate seven acre parcel to the east. With <br />the present two acre lot minimum there could be two <br />additional lots subdivided in this parcel. The low <br />area possibly would require a lift station which could <br />access through the easement and serve the residences <br />on Scotch Pine Lane. <br />2.easesientialso jCOuld-Hsicoomroodate a water main that <br />would serve..the._resident*-, on Scotch Pine Lane and also . --k <br />extend ito^serve^hthmwproperty:on the east. This..posalbly*;^ii^i^ <br />ryV;,would,permlt-^a^yooping.'^jrof^the water system <br />' Waterr;maln design. <br />TOiTabove-T^ablil^^ are *d <br />e <br />f*.the development of^aisewecrand water system in t <br />- "f^without a comprehenaive:'*sewer'-and water plan it is di <br />assess ;the actual utilization'^of the easement. Howev <br />appears that the easement could be used for either one or <br />~v^:^sewer ai^ water... It ie my opinion-that the easement ehoaZd|nei9{P^|Pj||| <br />.•:-,v,>^ba abandoned unlesa it can be shown that future water end <br />design will not require an easement in this area. <br />Sincerely. <br />TEMPLE ASSOCIATES INC. <br />Duane H. Teazle. P.E. <br />DBTibjh