07-17-1995 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 17. 1995 («4 . Donald & Arlene Kielley - Continued) Rowlette said a side variance presented no problem in her view as the next residence over was a fair distance away Lindqui^ nx)ved. Rowlette seconded, to approve Application #2033 with the condition that all plastic areas be removed as well as the coiKrete and giavel areas The removal of the rock on the north side w ill be dependent on Staff findings concerning drainage It shall be further noted that this wxmld be the maximum amount of structural coverage allowed on this property in the hiture without removal ot'existing structure Ayes 4, Nays 0 (#5) #2034 MARY AND GENE ZULK, 1400 CHERRY PLACE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 7;5I-S:0I P.M. The Certificate of Mailing arkl Affidavit of Publication were noted Mr. Zulk was present This application is for a 10x26’ covered deck addition on the street side. A structural coverage variance is required Structural coverage exists at l7.6^^o, allowed at 15%, and is proposed at 19 9%, for an increase of 263 s f, or 2 3% Mabusth reported that hardcover can be reduced in the 75-250' zone with the removal of a rock patio at northeast side of residence of 175 s f Hardcover exists at 49 2%, proposed at 51.8%, for an additional 213 s f, or 2.64% No side setback variance is required. Mabusth asked the applicant if there was any existing hardcover areas that could be removed to offset the hardcover amount. Zulk said he had no drainage problems and suggested removal of the stone patio on the northeast side. Lindquist asked about the walkway on the north side of the property. This was found to be used to access the lower level There are stairs to access this level, and Zulk said the sidewalk underneath could be removed, but decking will be placed over this area. Lindquist said, although he was unhappy with additional hardcover, he saw no area where removal could be done to offset the new Mabusth noted with the removal of the 175 s.f or 2 2®/q of patio hardcover, there would be an overall reduction in hardcover. This results in less hardcover than originally existed. There were no public comments. Commission asked that a disclaimer be added to the resolution allowing no more structural improvements on this property in the future without removal of existing structures 5