Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JULY 17. 1995 <br />(«4 . Donald & Arlene Kielley - Continued) <br />Rowlette said a side variance presented no problem in her view as the next residence over <br />was a fair distance away <br />Lindqui^ nx)ved. Rowlette seconded, to approve Application #2033 with the condition <br />that all plastic areas be removed as well as the coiKrete and giavel areas The removal of <br />the rock on the north side w ill be dependent on Staff findings concerning drainage It shall <br />be further noted that this wxmld be the maximum amount of structural coverage allowed <br />on this property in the hiture without removal ot'existing structure Ayes 4, Nays 0 <br />(#5) #2034 MARY AND GENE ZULK, 1400 CHERRY PLACE - VARIANCES - <br />PUBLIC HEARING 7;5I-S:0I P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing arkl Affidavit of Publication were noted <br />Mr. Zulk was present <br />This application is for a 10x26’ covered deck addition on the street side. A structural <br />coverage variance is required Structural coverage exists at l7.6^^o, allowed at 15%, and <br />is proposed at 19 9%, for an increase of 263 s f, or 2 3% Mabusth reported that <br />hardcover can be reduced in the 75-250' zone with the removal of a rock patio at <br />northeast side of residence of 175 s f Hardcover exists at 49 2%, proposed at 51.8%, for <br />an additional 213 s f, or 2.64% No side setback variance is required. <br />Mabusth asked the applicant if there was any existing hardcover areas that could be <br />removed to offset the hardcover amount. Zulk said he had no drainage problems and <br />suggested removal of the stone patio on the northeast side. <br />Lindquist asked about the walkway on the north side of the property. This was found to <br />be used to access the lower level There are stairs to access this level, and Zulk said the <br />sidewalk underneath could be removed, but decking will be placed over this area. <br />Lindquist said, although he was unhappy with additional hardcover, he saw no area where <br />removal could be done to offset the new Mabusth noted with the removal of the 175 s.f <br />or 2 2®/q of patio hardcover, there would be an overall reduction in hardcover. This results <br />in less hardcover than originally existed. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Commission asked that a disclaimer be added to the resolution allowing no more structural <br />improvements on this property in the future without removal of existing structures <br />5