My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-17-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
07-17-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:43:59 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:40:19 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 19, 1995 <br />ijf} - ?.lichiiw! Plnnk - Ccntinu^) <br />Commissioners agreed that changes to the plans were made as asked. Mabusth noted a <br />newly defined designated wetland on the property. Mabusth commented that a vacation <br />of the utUity and drainage easement on the old shared lot line would be asked for when <br />further division occurs. <br />Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to approve Application #2025 with the Staff <br />recommendations 1-4, and with the understandinu that if Lot 1 is subdivided, it will be <br />subject to the standards and ordinances at that time. Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />(#2) #2029 WILLIAM F. SMITH, 2580 FOX STREET - PRELIMINARY <br />SUBDIVISION - 7:50-8:30 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Mr. Smith was present. <br />At the last meeting of the commission. Smith was asked to gain acce^ to the newly <br />created lot from Fox Run. Four property owners have sent letters voicing their opposition <br />to the use of this access. The applicant's subdivision proposal requests the use of the <br />existing easement driveway to serve all three lots. It was not^ that there is 2+ acres of <br />dry contiguous land to the west of the driveway. Mabusth said another alternative <br />suggested at the sketch plan review would be to allow a second curb cut to serve the new <br />lot, but that would conflict with the City's comprdiensive management plan for rural areas. <br />An earlier subdivision stipulated a disclaimer that if an additional lot was created, a private <br />road would be needed to serve 3 lots. To satis^ the current code, a 24' wide paved road <br />would be needed with a cul-de-sac within the only area available, a derignated wetland. <br />Mabusth said if division was considered a back lot/front lot configuration, an ouflot at 30 <br />width could be installed along the east lot line. Lot 2 would have to continue using the <br />existing drive. There would be minimal encroachment of the designated wetland. <br />The applicant would like the Commission to recommend using the existing driveway for <br />the lot. Smith has added 4" of new gravel, which has already conformed to the ruts. The <br />applicant will bring in a blade to cut the drive to make it uniform and then crown it for <br />orooer drainage. Smith said this would be done to all of the driveway and the turnaround <br />areas. <br />Mabusth noted that the on-site septic tests confirm suitable area for septic treatment on <br />Lot 2. There would be contiguous 2-acre of dry land to west of easement drive that <br />intersects Lot 2.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.