07-17-1995 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #2035 Julv 7’ 1995 Paee 2 as to where the trail will be finally placed. There are specific topographic limitations along the northern portions of this property and approximately 300 lineal feet of plantings are located at the northwest comer. This subdivision is reviewed in more detail below. Lot Configurations All lots will meet the two acre dry contiguous minimum lot size. Review Exhibit H. there are no designated wetlands. Applicant will be responsible for having the property reviewed by a soils analyst to determine if Type 1 and 2 wetlands exist. As in our earliei subdivision reviews, it is not the policy of the City to exclude Type 1 and 2 wetlands from the dry contiguous area of a property. The City will only require special covenants to be filed on the Chain of Title alerting future property owners of their existence and the need to comply with both Federal and State regulations. Each lot meets the required width to the rear of the 50’ street setback. Septic Gaffron has reviewed the preliminary septic information and notes that the drainfield sites on Lots 1. 2 and 3 would appear to meet the required standards of the septic code but notes septic sites on Lots 1 and 3 along the west boundary may be impacted by a future bike trail. Prior to filing the preliminary plat, it will be necessary to determine the exact location of the trail and make any necessary alteration in the sighting of septic drainfields. It is preferred that septic sites be located at least 20’ from the trail. Septic sites on Lot 4 may not be feasible as shown because of the lack of area needed to support two 5-bedroom mound systems. Gaffron suggests that in reviewing the topographic map that there may be suitable area at the northeast comer of Lot 4 for a second site but this would involve the loss of trees. Praina2e Staff is very aware of drainage problems along the north side of Watertown Road to the west of Golden View. This historic drainage problem will have to be addressed with the proposed four lot subdivision. Access During the review of the Golden View subdivision, the issue of extending access from Golden View Drive to the 9^h acre parcel to the west was discussed. It was determined by the City at that time that only a fumre extension would be taken to the north and that accep for this 9*/i acre parcel would be resolved with the future division. Revirw Exhibit B, applicant asks