Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />Zo ’iing File #2041 <br />July 12, 1995 <br />Page 2 <br />Description of Request <br />In Mav 1994 the City approved lot width, street and side setback variances to permit <br />construction of the new residence on propeny. Review Exhibit J, the conditions of that approval <br />required that applicant provide detailed grading plans to ensure that there would be no impact <br />on adjacent residential propenies. At the time of the issuance of a building pemit, detail was <br />also required for retaining walls that were to be installed along the west side where ci^ in the <br />steeper elevations would be called for to allow for the access drive. Review Exhibits F and L, <br />in the building permit review the applicant or contractor was advised of the need to provide <br />specifications for any wall section that would exceed a 4‘ height. <br />The more intense excavation in the street yard beyond what was approved with the building <br />permit requires special consideration because the additional fill has been placed along the c^t <br />^de yard and to the north rear yard. The current or alternate elevations along the east yard lot <br />line present problems of severe erosion impacting both the subject property and property to east. <br />restoration of 2:1 slopes and replaming of trees that will obviously be lost ^ a result of thew <br />excavations. Applicant will replant with evergreens. The engineer has reviewed the <br />specifications for the retaining wall and has approved the wall. <br />There is also discussion of a need to install a catch basin within the driveway as garage clevauon <br />is at the same elevation of drive. The engineer requests detail as to the final location of that <br />catch basin and the outlet. Because of the narrowness of this lot and the steepness of the <br />elevations adjacent to the house, the engineer also recommends gutters and downspouts for the <br />residence. Downspouts should be located on a final grading plan. <br />John Gerhardson. our Public Works Director, has reviewed the property and approved the <br />second curb cut recognizing the need for safety on the severely limited roadway. <br />Please refer to Exhibit E. Applicant has provided a hardship statement as to the need to proceed <br />with the more extensive land alteration in the street yard and need for the second curb.