Laserfiche WebLink
To:Chair Peterson are! Oroiro Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />From:Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Administrator <br />Date:April 7. 1995 <br />Subject:#2009 Tom and Maureen Palm. 1685 Concordia Street - Variances - Public <br />Hearing <br />Status of Original Application Approved for Applicants on December 12, 1994: Review <br />Exhibit E. the resolution that granted approval of an average lakeshore setb^k, lakeshore <br />setback and hardcover variances for a proposed second story addition over the existing principal <br />structure. <br />Pertinent Ordinances Involving Current Application <br />1.Section 10.22. Subdivision 1 (A) - Lakeshore setback. <br />Allowed = 0 <br />Proposed deck = 40 ’ <br />Existing deck = 28’ ^ • i t, u <br />Principal structure = 47.5’ (Cantilevered window extends 2.5 mto lakeshore <br />setback, note roofed entrance, Exhibit O, at lakeside not shown on floor plan. <br />Applicant to provide additional information.) <br />Principal structure variance = 27.5’ <br />Deck struemre variance = 35’ <br />1 <br />2.Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) - Proposed deck encroaches 10’ in front of average <br />lakeshore setback. <br />3.Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Review of hardcover, <br />A. 0-75’ setback area = 3,750 s.f. <br />Existing = 1,064 s.f. or 28% <br />Original application = 1,064 s.f. or 28% <br />Current = 986 s.f. or 26% <br />B 75-250’ setback area = 8,940 s.f. <br />Allowed = 2,235 s.f. or 25% <br />Existing = 2,979 s.f. or 33% <br />Original application = 2,876 s.f. or 32.1% <br />Current proposal = 2,901 s.f. or 32.4% <br />Hardcover decrease = 78 s.f. or 0.6% (original 103 s.f. or 1.15%) <br />C.250-500’ setback area = 1,450 s.f. <br />Allowed = 435 s.f. or 30% <br />Existing = 594 s f. or 40% <br />Original application = 594 s.f. or 40% <br />Current proposal = 490 s.f. or 34% <br />Hardcover decrease = 104 s.f. or 6% (original 40%, no change proposed) <br />mat