My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-17-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
04-17-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:44:01 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:40:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON APRIL 17, 1995 <br />(#8 - *^2011 Tim & Lori Line - Continued) <br />The Robert Wolfe’s inquired if any tree removal wtHild be needed They noted that the <br />roof line is below the tree line Lori Line noted that it is their desire to maintain trees and <br />add more if necessary <br />Nolan moved. Lindquist seconded, to approve Application #2011 for a height v ariance <br />and hardcover variance in the 75-250' zone noting the benefit of the drainage system and <br />the design mitigating restrictions 1 he motion includes item 1-5 and 1-3 as noted in the <br />Staff recommendations Ayes 6, Nays I, Rowlette, voted mainly on principal, as <br />hardcover v-tuiance is required for new construction <br />(#9) «0I4 JAMES NYSTROM, 1745 CONCORDIA STREET - VARUNCES - <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:59-9:20 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted <br />Mr Nystrom was present and represented by his architect, Greg Frazee. <br />Mabu,sth reported that the application is for proposed additions which would require <br />lakeshore setback variances The proposed additions are located in front of the average <br />lakeshore setback line The existing structure's patio encroaches into the neighbor's <br />property The neighbor's 3-season porch also enroaches on this property The great room <br />addition would be located I 6” from the south side lot line and the rear bedroom addition <br />1 6’ from the same side lot line. <br />Frazee reported their surprise when the survey showed the structure 1.6* from the lot line. <br />This will affect the preliminary plans as presented Frazee noted that the improvements <br />stay within the roof line of the existing house. The upper level improvements are for a <br />deck, atrium portion of great room, and stairwell to gain access to the master bedroom <br />Peterson inquired about the distance between the structures. Frazee responded that a <br />change would be needed for the foyer area and possible move of the great room or <br />guestroom to the north side of the house Rowlette commented that there are problems <br />with either additions not meeting the side setback, and a change in plans would be <br />necessary. <br />Frazee asked for commission’s comments on the hardcover in the 75-250’ zone Lindquist <br />said the area needs to be measured out and figured for reductions <br />Berg asked if the foundation would be able to handle the new additions. Frazee said the <br />original foundation should be adequate to handle the new additions. Mabusth asked had <br />this been confirmed of a structural engineer, for if a new foundation is needed, the whole <br />structure could be moved. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.