Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
NtlNlJTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON APRIL 17, 1995 <br />(#5 - #2008 l essa Marchessault/Gregory Becker - Continued) <br />Peterson commented that there is 100®/© hardcover in the 250 ’-500' zone, where 30% is <br />allowable The applicant commented that the areas of hardcover were done prior to his <br />owning the property and must have been obtained through the proper channels Rowlette <br />responded that permits are not needed for driveways The applicant was informed that <br />when applications come before the commission, this is the only opportunity for the City to <br />make changes to areas of excess hardcover it was also noted that the purpose in the <br />limitations of hardcover is to serve the lake <br />Nolan moved. Schroeder seconded, to approv’e Application #2008 for two additions with <br />the stipulation that the hardcover be reduced by the removal of the rock area on the west <br />side of the home adjacent to the sidewalk and a reduction in the concrete block patio to <br />5'x5' in the 75-250* zone, and the removal of the upper driveway asphalt area east of the <br />garage in the 250-500 ’ zone Ayes 6, Nays 0 <br />(#6) #2009 TOM & MAliREEN PALM, 1685 CONCORDIA STREET, AMENDED <br />VARIANCE APPLICATION - PUBLIC HEARING 7:40-8:16 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted <br />Mr. & Mrs. Palm were present. <br />This property is located at the north end of Concordia and was approved for a second <br />story addition above the existing building envelope for an average lakeshore setback <br />variance, lakeshore setback variance within the 0-75* zone, and for hardcover variance. <br />The applicant's builder advised them not to proceed with the remodel but to remove the <br />existing structure and rebuild The rew resdence structure would be located 50* from the <br />shoreline and a 10x30' lakeside deck located at 40* from the shoreline. <br />Mabusth noted questions associated with the elevation and floor plan The cantilevered <br />window would extend 2 5* into the lakeshore setback The roofed entry at approximately <br />the same depth also encroaches into the lakeshore setback area Mabusth said the <br />additions are part of the principal structure and must meet the 50* setback. <br />The applicant clarified the need to meet the 50* setback and agreed to adjust the plans to <br />meet this setback <br />The deck is shown at the 40* setback. The applicant reported receiving DNR approval <br />from Ceil Strauss for the deck's location regarding the DNR regulations. <br />Mabusth commented that the City has received phone calls and letters from neighbors <br />voicing their approval of the current proposal.