Laserfiche WebLink
Neither the applicant nor representive were present. <br />Rowtote moved. Schroeder seconded, to table Applnation «1800 unt.l the wHcan< <br />could be present. Ayes 7. Nays 0. <br />PL.A.NN1NG COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />Nolan reported that the Crystal Creek <br />were approved under the _ ,5, , ro*j^ even though aesthetically <br />the Jundt applicauon reqmnng r^val of the -^■1^';“;^ „ see the <br />not pleasing but noting Nolan said Applicant Perl did not come to the <br />Jundfs pr^t P[“ .iXould «t on it at their nem meeting <br />meeting Council moved ^ Thj I chedoff applicstio" was approved,with or without the presence of the appbeam The Ldmdoff ^ <br />Nolan said the DNR changed its viewpoint, gnmg wroval to the 20 setback <br />Wicklund application was approved as recommended. <br />(#11) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION <br />is to aUow all members an opportunity to become more tnvolved in the meetings. <br />Schroeder suggested that Park Commission Chair Richard Rinl imend the tour at the <br />"mert^itute as it woulu be a good resource for the Park Commission, <br />Schroder moved, Nolan seconded, to change the meeting time of the Planning <br />Commission to 6:30 p m. Ayes 7, Nays 0.