Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />fr <br />Mr. Johnson voiced his STiStmion with the length of time it has taken to come to any <br />decision over the vacation of the right-of-way He reiterated how the casement and <br />Johnson feels that Nelson is entitled to the use of the <br />throuch the aUev' and through the lakeside He said <br />vacation are two separate issues <br />road but not entitled to both accesses <br />there has been an impact on the sale of propenies in the area because of the right^f-way <br />issue. <br />Mr. Nelson read a prepared statement of his objeaion to the vacation of "Forest <br />Boulevard", as the lakes.de right-of-way was once called His opinion is that he would <br />be landlocked if the vacation is permitted. Orono had vacated all of this lakeside road <br />except that portion in ftont of the properties owned by Johnson and Nelsoa If the City <br />vacated that part located in front of the Johnson property. Nelson feels he would be left <br />on his own to solve his access problem. <br />Johnson was asked by Callahan if he was willing to give the easement to Nelsoa which <br />he responded he would Barnett said that the locauon of the prescriptive easemem may <br />not be the ideal way to get from the house to the road and asked Johnson if he would be <br />willing to grant an easement to an alternate route. Johnson said he was not willing to do <br />this. <br />CaUahan agreed that the City needs to provide access for the Nelson's. Barrett <br />concurred; though, he believes Nelson would have legal access through prescription It <br />was discussed that if Johnson gave prescriptive easement to Nelson and the aaton was <br />uncontested in couri. the cost would be about S2.000. The CouncU would then take