My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-17-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
04-17-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:44:01 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:40:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLimON OF THE Cm^ COL*NCIL <br />• NO. 8 5 0 ____ <br />y=\33 <br />J. <br />4. <br />3 UfT^ CW , <br />The property consists of 14,140 s.f. or .32 acres. <br />Three members of the Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br />Nove"mber 21, 1994, and recommended unanimous approval of the variances as <br />proposed based upon the following fmdings; <br />A. Th.c lets m the Concordia neighborhood were developed prior to zoning <br />standards for residential development of lake shore properties. <br />B. <br />c. <br />uess ^ <br />Two-thirds of the residence structure is located within the lake shore <br />protected area. <br />The proposed second story e.xpansion will not result in an increase in <br />hardcover. <br />The lake shore view windows of the adjacent residences wUl not be <br />neeatively impacted by the second story addition. <br />55*E. The homes on either side have panial second stories. <br />Aj,rn to* sioe <br />Vies <br />5. <br />The City has received no negative comments from the neighbors who <br />would receive the most impact from the improvement. The City has been <br />contacted by adjacent neighbors supporting the proposal. <br />The lot is 50’ in width and the existing footprint of the residence struemre <br />is 20’. The structure conforms to the required side setbacks. <br />The improvement would be consistent with current improvements on <br />adjacent properties. <br />The proposed improvement would not have a detrimemal impact on the <br />values of the surrounding residences. <br />The Citv Council fmds that the conditions existing on this property are peculwr <br />to it and do not applv generally to other property tn this zoning distnct. tha <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />I <br />r»«Mos o*«
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.