My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-17-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
04-17-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:44:01 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:40:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMNOSSION <br />MEETING HELD ON APRIL 17. 1995 <br />(#10 - #2006 Janies Bruce - Continued) <br />The applicant said he has receKed verbal agreement from Jim Hale to the west for the <br />1/10 acre The applicant has not yet dealt with the encroachment issue involving the <br />property to the immediate north He noted that the minimum lot width of 200' on lot 3 <br />was missed by I /4" according to the survey' Bruce also asked if the sewer assessment <br />must be paid up front Mabusth said that this was the general rule with a subdivision as <br />well as the payment of the park dedication fee The applicant asked for a timeline for the <br />subdiv ision as he has a purchase agreement deadline of May 15. 1995 <br />Rowlette brought up the issue of noise from outdoor weddings and services occurring at <br />the nearby church The applicant said he has spoken with neighbors and a church <br />spokesman about this It was noted that there were no restriaions on these events at this <br />time The appiicam asked if a residential zone has restrictions, and Mabusth responded <br />that it depends on how the CUP is stated The real estate agent involved in the transaction <br />noted the reduction in the number of weddings and lack of any problem with the issue at <br />this time He also noted that he felt the church pastor has discouraged the sale of the <br />property these past years Rowlette commented that the issue was brought up to inform <br />the potential property ow ner of the possible noise problem <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMI N fS <br />(#11) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE <br />ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 10,1995 - DALE LINDQUIST <br />Lindquist reported that the Council has asked Staff to present both residential and <br />commercial options on the proposed shelter site at the May 18 meeting Lindquist noted <br />that Hurr was open to the possible change and Jabbour preferred commercial with B-4 <br />zoning, which is professional offices use with specific limitations. Schroder commented <br />that the commission's review was their recommendation that Westonka not benefit from a <br />zoning change to commercial. <br />Lindquist noted a Council work session scheduled on May 10 on a possible change to the <br />code regarding number of accesses allowed from driveways This issue stemmed from the <br />Melamed sketch plan for access off of City Drive If access was granted, the driveway by <br />code would need to be upgraded Jabbour did not agree with a variance and felt the City <br />should adher to its own code Council scheduled the work session to review this code as <br />this issue has come up frequently <br />Lindquist noted the approval by Council of the Upton request for a variance.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.