My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-19-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
06-19-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:33:30 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:29:17 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
‘3.. <br />To:Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />From:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />Date:June 9, 1995 <br />Subject:#2029 William F. Smith, 2580 Fox Street - Preliminary Subdivision, Class III <br />Public Hearing <br />^Thc property is no longer located within shoreland area with the reclassification of the <br />upper French Lake basin. <br />Total area = 10.23 acres, 3.07 wet, 7.16 dr>’ <br />Proposed Lot 1 = 6.07 total acres, 3.5 acres dry, 2.57 wet <br />Lot 2 == 4.16 total acres, 3.66 acres dry, .5 wet <br />Pertinent Ordinances <br />Zoning Regulations <br />1.Section 10 03 Subdivision 6 (B) - Combination of separate parcels prohibited in meeting <br />minimum acreage requirement. Note 2.15 dry contiguous acres exist to west of easement <br />drive within Lot 2. <br />2. <br />3. <br />Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) - RR-IB lot standards. <br />Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - Minimum 26’ setback to be maintained from weUands. <br />Note applicant proposes use of existing easement drive to serve three properties <br />proposing no further expansion in width of road. <br />Subdivision Regulations ^ _ <br />4. Section 11.03, Definition 24 - Lot area minimum, <br />5.Section 11.03 - Definition of back lot/front lot, review Exhibit L. There will be a need <br />to address variances to this section as current easement road that encroaches existmg l^t <br />2 of the Beau Marais plat cannot be replatted to designate through outlot at a 30 width. <br />Ordinance also limits use of 30’ driveway outlot to two units. <br />6. <br />7. <br />Section 11.03, Subdivision 10 (A) (1-7) - Necessary findings for granting variances. <br />Section 11.33, Subdivision 42 - A typical section access serving three to six residential <br />units call for private road. <br />Comprehensive Plan Transportation Section <br />CMP 7-17 - Private driveway may serve up to three residential units. <br />\ <br />\ <br />\
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.