06-19-1995 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

minutes of the orono planning commission meeting held on may 15, 1995 (#12 - #2019 Leisd Cox - Continued) Mabus* hifoniied the menibm thil the applfcaioo wM for » Clus I reswirem in the Oveooo Building. TheKeevtnjrpropeftyafothemnnetfae of tW. monettv Mr Keeveny wu piwent end itiD owm that building. Mabuith showed the survey of tl* buiMing and the parking. 1^ has M staUe Mr Keavenycoohnned that there was no shared docking or perkii* areas. C^saidthe parking wUl still be workable after improvemotts on CoRd 15 is complct^. N^ questioned if it was appropriate to ask for acertain number ofparki^ stalU. Mabusth d* ««# thi« wM neoessarv. noting there was never a parking problem at tills property. The site plans call for a coffee shop ty|» re^auram serving espremosy sandwiches, and soups. Peterson said the CUP application is consistent with the use. Smith moved, Nolan seconded, to approve Application #2019 for a condhkmal use penwl to include the three recommendations Ayes 5, Nays 0. Mabusth added a third condition to the application. There is now one bathroom. Separate bathrooms must be provided for men and women. (#13) SKETCH PLAN REVIEW - #1S00 MICHAEL W-ANK, 4115 WATERTOWN ROAD - REQUEST FOR CONCEPTUAL DIRECTION FROM PLANNING COMMISSION Michael Plank was present. (jaffion reported that approval had been ori^nally given in Fdiruary of 1993; but throu^ an apparem miscommunication, final exhibiu were never submitted by the appbcam. Consequently, the applicant never went before the Cou^l and expired in Febniary of 1994 The backlot ordinance was adopted since the original approval, and any new subdivisions after January of 1994 need to meet the current standards. An exa^le of how that this application is the requirement for 150% of the lot area and width. Gaflfron stated that at this time, this is a sketch plan review and requires no formal vote. In way of background, prior to 1988 this property was a 25 acre parcel. In 1988, it was subdivided imo three lots and a 30* width access outlot. Approval was given for tte shared use of the driveway outlot for the new house on Lot 3 and a second lot which might be split fi’om it in the future. In 1993, preliminary approval was given to rMrrai^ the boundary between Lots 2 and 3, leaving 6.2 acres with the house on Lot 3 and 13.6 acres with the house on Lot 2. Plank then would have the ability to seU the house on Lot 3 but maintain comrol of the outlot and enough acreage for a possible split in the future. i