My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-19-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
06-19-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:33:30 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:29:17 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CX)MMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 15. 1995 <br />(#10 - #2017 William Hibbs - Continued) <br />Mabusth reported that the apphcaat was before the Planning Commissioo a few yean ago <br />for a proposed enpansion of the residence. The application was dented by the Planning <br />Commtsiion due to the excessive amoum of hardwvtr. The hardcover issue involved <br />structural and non-structural hardcover. <br />-illThe current proposal involves the r( <br />residence and replace with a 23 5’x44.3 ’. 2-1/2 story addition. The driveway wouw De <br />relocated off of Fagersioss Road. Two accessory structures will be removed, and a new <br />driveway will be installed. The new access has been a(^>roved by the Engineer. <br />Mabusth explained how side setbacks work on ewner lots; 15' setback is rMpiired off <br />Webb Street, and 33* is proposed. 30* is required for a front street setback. There will be <br />23'setback from Fagemess Point Road. Mabusth noted that if the structure was to be <br />moved to the north to meet required 30* setback, more excavation would be retpitred. AM <br />improvements result in hardcover reductions. <br />Lindquist asked how close the deck is to the road. Mabusth said the deck is located about <br />l5’-20'. <br />In reviewing the information, the structural corerage is reduced by 3% and is proposed at <br />23%. The hardcover reduction is 18%; reducing it to 31.97% in the 75-25(7 setback area. <br />Setbacks are improved. <br />Peterson commented that the proposal is a nugor improvfiSient to the lot and the structure. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Nolan asked if the shed on the property would be removed and received an affir <br />reply. <br />ll^ll <br />Smith asked that the yard be cleaned up and stuff removed. The applicant said it would be <br />done after construction is completed as there was no place to store anything now. <br />Mabusth reported that applicant advised that there will be no retaining wall to the west <br />adjacent to garage but graduated landscaping. <br />Mabusth asked applicant if he considered moving the structin^ to meet the 30' setback. <br />Hibbs re^jxmded that this would require removal of a large Hackberry tree and would not <br />want to lose the tree.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.