My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-19-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
06-19-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:33:30 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:29:17 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 15, 1995 <br />(#3 - #2022 Robcit Mdaned - Condmied) <br />Hint spoke for Art Elhs. EBis said a dike was fbnned when the existing drive at Old <br />Ciystal Bay Road was buih. It had been dry prior to that time. Melamed reported that the <br />En^neer had said the tow land had to drain to the north. Host commented that EDis said <br />the land used to drain to the southeast. Peterson said drainage was an issue in all <br />applications and would took at ensuring that no further problems occurred. <br />Smith asked for clarification on driveways being the personal decision of a homeowno^. <br />Mabusth said the curb cuts require approval, but where the drive comes off the curb cut is <br />decided by the homeowner. <br />i;twtq«it€> moved, Nolan seconded, to approve the preliminaiy subdivision for <br />Melamed/Lauer with the understanding that a variance be granted off the City driveway to <br />allow two served from the City drive with Four tots in the total subdivision.^ ^ <br />Application meet the 9 conditions stated in Staff memo in addition to condition as <br />fr>Uows: 10)createbu£faedzonii^fbrdriveway zones, 11) rqxjft received from City <br />Attorney prior to going before the Council on the City's legd right to change the <br />ordinance or aDow a variance granted to the City, and 12) encourage devetoper to change <br />the subdivision name from the "preserve* name. The Applicant asked for clarification if <br />Park Dedication, a buffer zone, or an outlet would be done on the east side of the <br />property. Mabusth said the City usually does not take wetlands as part of Park <br />Dedication. Nolan asked if the purpose was to only provide a buffer zone. said that <br />other wildlife concerns have been noted, such as a north-south pathway for wildlife. Flint <br />said granting a fee would be preferred but would like to see a buffer for the wildlife <br />\imay. Ayes 5, Nays 0.141 <br />(«4) *in» DAVID AND VICKI VICKEHMAN, 1475 DUNWOODY AVENUE - <br />VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF FUBUC HEARING - 7:31-7:41 P.M. <br />Mr. A Mrs. Vkkerman were pr^ent. <br />Mabusth reported that the application was or^inally filed for a deck structure withm the <br />0-75’ zone. The Plaiuiing Commission denied the application at the Mardi meeting, but <br />confirmed the need for a new staircase along with the removal of the boat house. The <br />City Engineer will need to confirm whether an existing retaining wall will be needed once <br />the boathouse is removed. The area where the boathouse sits will be restored with natural <br />landscaping. Mabusth commented that a demolition permit will be needed and noted that <br />18 cubic yards of fill will be placed in low areas and to provide adequate soil base to allow <br />planting of ground cover. Landsciqniig wiU naiiiiiuze the fill. There is also the option of <br />stones or chips but no geogrid material is to be used. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.