Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE (mONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 19, 1995 <br />(«I0 - #2027 Richard KaU - Contimjed) <br />Rowlette moved, Berg seconded, to approve Apphcttion #2027 for a lot area variance <br />with conditions M as listed The AppUcant would have 30 days afta* receiving the <br />occupancy permit to comply with condition #4. The property is also to be cleared of <br />outside debris and cleaned up. Ayes 7, Nays 0 Kail inquired about the vacation of tlw <br />alley. Kail was informed this would be a separate process anJ would require a puUic <br />houing He was further informed to contact John Gerfaardj <br />(#11) RICHARD LAVERE, 99S WILDHURST TRAIL - VARUNCES- <br />PUBLIC HEARING 10:15>I0:30 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication wm noted <br />Mr. LaVere was present <br />Hk Application b for an average lakeshore setback variance and hardcovo- variance for <br />an upper level deck at the lakeside of the residence A 1992 variance for a 20*x31* garage <br />stall addition made by a past owner required removal of 210' of landscape plastic and <br />removal of a garage This has been complied with Hardcover is now at 4900 s.f or <br />35.41% <br />The deck would be 8* wide and expand to 14* maximum depth for 10* length. A smaO <br />concrete patio exists beneath proposed deck. There is also a sidewalk beneath the deck <br />offsetting an additional 90 s.f The drawing b rot to scale and shows 5082 s.f. of <br />hardcover, wherein, the survey shows 4991 s.f The plans provide no detail on vet unda <br />the deck. <br />The Planning Commissioners said they had no problem with the avenge lakeshore setback <br />variance Lindquist was concerned with the driveway and requested hardcover nund>ers <br />be verified. <br />Rowlette asked that no application be reviewed in the future without forms bong <br />completely filled out. She also asked that the hardcover suy at the amount it presently is <br />or be reduced. Rowlette noted in speaking with the owner at the property, a canopy <br />would be removed and recommended to them that the deck did not extend beyond the <br />windows. It was also recommended that the patio underneath the deck be removed. The <br />present deck b planned to extend the whole length of the house. <br />Commission asked that the worksheet be conq)ieted prior to thb application going bdbre <br />the Council and hardcover be no more than 35.41%. <br />Schroeder nK)ved, Nolan seconded, to approve Application #2030 subject to hardcover <br />supported by worksheet at 4900 s.f or 35.41%. Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />i