My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-19-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
06-19-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:33:30 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:29:17 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #2024 <br />June \5, 1995 <br />Page 3 <br />Review Exhibit E, applicant proposes the installation ot partitions to create a ^ond <br />office area Applicant proposes no changes within the residential use. Access to the residence <br />will continue to be off Lydiard and all commercial activities will be located off Shadywood. All <br />signaee allowances for the commercial use will be subject to the signage standards tor the B-4 <br />zone.^ Applicam may wish to consider whether he wishes a permanent address assigned at a <br />Shadywood or Lydiard Avenue address. Although the application has been brought under a <br />Lydiard Avenue address, a Shadywood Road address is the current official designation. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1 Will the proposed multiple residential and commercial use of this property re<|uire sp^ial <br />limitations or restrictions on commercial use? The residential unit within this zoning <br />district requires one acre. The property is less than one acre although the B-4 zonmg <br />district would require only 20,000 s f. The commercially-used portion of structure is <br />a single story 26 ’ x 24’ addition. Should the conditional use permit specify an approved <br />number of employees for the commercial use? Applicant proposes two full-tune suff <br />members and a part-time person. Parking and safety issues alone necessitate some type <br />of control of tte commercial use. <br />2. Do members agree that hardcover information is not necessary with Ais review? If <br />applicant at some time in the lumre proposes any additions or paving expansions, <br />hardcover inventory would have to be provided with the permit. <br />3. The neighborhood appears to be in complete support of the continued residential use. <br />The location of the residential and commercial uses of the structure present miniMl <br />impact on the immediate adjacent residential neighborhood. Do members have other <br />concerns? <br />Options of Action <br />To either deny or approve James Wilson ’s conditional use application to allow contim^ <br />residential use of the B-4 zoned property considered a non-conforming use based on some of the <br />findings suggested in the staff memo above, i.e. history, zoning of 1950, pattern of surroundmg <br />residential development, layout/design of structure, no proposed expansions of structure..... <br />If the application is to be denied, please refer to the necessary findings set forth in <br />Section 10.09, Subdivision 6 (A) (1-3). <br />Any recommendation of approval must include the following conditions: <br />1. Conditions set forth by City Engineer in his report dated June 7, 1995 that <br />includes a recommended site plan indicating three designated off-street parking <br />stalls.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.