My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
05-15-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:33:22 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:28:27 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. <br />To:Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorsc, Citv Administrator <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />Date:Mav 11. 1995 <br />Subject:#2022 Melamed/Lauer Partners, 920 Old Crystal Bay - Preliminary Subdivision <br />Public Hearing <br />Zoning Di^rict:RR-IB, Two Acre Minimum Diy Contiguous. Portions of property are <br />located within Shorcland areas and subject to hardcover controls. <br />Pertinent Ordinances u u ui i . k-1 Section 11 03 Subdivision 24 - Minimum lot area. Dry buildablc land must be <br />contiguous and not divided by a wetland. Dry buildablc areas within Lot 4 can be <br />credited against contiguous dry buildable as designated wetland is merely a drainageway <br />for the majority of the wetland. This is con-istcni with previous actions of the City. <br />Note shared drivewav located within Lot 3. The easement area granted m favor of Lot <br />4 must be e.xcluded from Lot 3’s dry buildable area. Applicant s surveyor shall confirm <br />adjusted area. Applicant has placed driveway in order to protect alternate septic site on <br />Lot 4. <br />Section 11.33. Subdivision 42 - Typical section. Three to six units require upgrade to <br />a private/public road. The City is currenUy reviewing standards for classification of <br />driveway and roads within the City. The current layout will require a variance to this <br />section of the Code as City driveway would now serve four residential units with three <br />residential curb cuts. Review Exhibit H-1-3, Council concurred that they would prefer <br />amending the Code rather than granting variances to standards for driveways owned by <br />City. Refer to Exhibit B, applicant has filed the application based on the conceptual <br />directives of the Council. Applicant will make any improvement to the public driveway <br />deemed necessary by either the current Code or an amended Code. <br />We should also note applicant is being granted a variance to this section because the <br />Code would call for an internal road at the four lot density. <br />3. Chapter 11, Class III Subdivision. <br />4.Section 11.02, Subdivision 10 (A) (1-7) - Necessary findings for the granting of <br />variances. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Applicant’s Addendum <br />C - Plat Map <br />D - Property Owners’ List
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.