My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
05-15-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:33:22 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:28:27 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 15, 1995 <br />mi - #1800 Michael Plank - Continued) <br />Plank reiterated that it was necessary for him to sell the home on lot Z now He was <br />informed that any other changes would be reevaluated and cautioned as to what was done <br />with lot Z as it could affect lots X and Y. <br />Gaffron informed Plank of the time schedule for preliminary approvals Peterson n <br />that a for sale sign could be installed now. A sale can be contingent on application <br />approval Peterson suggested Plank work out details with Staff <br />irted <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />(#14) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE <br />ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY t, 1995 • JANICE BERG <br />Berg reported that the Council approved the zoning apphcations. It was noted that the <br />Palm application was amended. The 50' lakeshore setback is to be met including any <br />structure or deck. The findii^ on the gradii^ md drainage pattern was removed. The <br />Lira application findings on drainage remained. <br />(#15) OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION <br />Gafiron was notified that there would possibly be no quorum for the May 18 public <br />information meeting If necessary, any vote would be contimied to the next meeting. <br />The Planning Commission members discussed the conceptual change in code in regards to <br />the shehCT proposal but not specifically tied to the shelter. South conunented that she <br />hoped public opposition to a commercial code would not hurt the possibility of the <br />project. <br />The Planning Commission also discussed the code regarding the number of drives coming <br />off of a public driveway which is an issue in the proposed Melamed development. Smith <br />said it was her understanding that the Council were against granting the City a variance. <br />Gafiron noted that the City granted itself a variance for the post office parking lot. <br />ADDITIONAL ITEMS <br />(#16) PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE APRIL 17, <br />1995 MEETING <br />Lindquist moved, Berg seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Planning Commission <br />Meeting of April 17, 1995. Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />: <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.