Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2016 <br />May 4, 1995 <br />Page 2 <br />Note principal structure to the immediate north is 35’ from the street line, review Exhibits D <br />and F. There is a total of 70’ between both residences. There will now be 58’ with the <br />proposed addition. The City has received no negative comments from the owners to the <br />imnwHtiatf. north. Rcview Exhibit E, the addition wUl have no impact on the existing septic nor <br />on potential septic expansion area within the south rear yard. The existing septic system is <br />conforming. <br />Statement of Hardships <br />A. Severe sloping topographies to rear yard make placement of a detached garage wi&in thei <br />rear yard impractical. <br />B. Installation of an access drive to rear yard would have a major impact on exist ’mg <br />elevations and possible adjacent properties. <br />C. Location of house on property and attached garage to existing residence. <br />D. The lot was created in 1964 prior to current 2 acre zoning stand^ and house <br />constructed in 1970 subject to setback standards of 1 acre zoning district. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Are the hardships valid? <br />2. Other issues raised by commission members. <br />Options of Action <br />To either approve or deny applicant’s improvement project seeking variances to required <br />setbacks. <br />Any recommendation for approval must include the condition that applicant must submit a <br />detailed grading plan providing detail on need for extension of retaining wall and maintenance <br />of positive drainage along shared lot line of property to immediate north.