My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-20-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
03-20-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:30:43 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:26:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1979 <br />March 10, 1995 <br />Page 2 <br />List of Exhibits <br />Original Exhibits Submitted for November Planning Commission Meeting <br />A - Application <br />C - Property Owners List <br />D - Plat Map <br />E - Hardcover Site Plan <br />F - Amended 0-75’ Hardcover Inventory <br />G - Amended Hardcover Facts 75-250’ Setback Area <br />J - Applicant ’s Original Proposal <br />N - Average Lakeshore Setback/Site Plan <br />New Exhibit <br />P - Amended Site Plan Locating 929.4 Contour <br />Status of Application <br />At the November meeting, the three member Commission provided conceptual <br />directioa'action. The application was to be presented to Council at their Etecember meeting for <br />final action as with all other applications at the November meeting The applicant was unable <br />to attend the December 12th meeting of the Council because of a serious illness. Mr. Little is <br />now able to r esent an amended proposal before the full Planning Commission. The neighbors <br />have received wrinen notification that the amended application will be reviewed by the Planning <br />Commission at your March meeting. <br />The applicant was advised at the November meeting that members would not consider <br />approving new construction to be located within the 0-75’ setback area. The Planning <br />Commission encouraged applicant to expand deck out of the 0-75’ setback area and within the <br />75-250’ setback area but also advised that they would want a matching removal of hardcover. <br />Review Exhibit P. Applicant proposes in the amended plan the reconstruction of the 14 ’ <br />X 26 ’ deck. Note portions of the southeast comer of deck will be located within the 0-75’ <br />setback area resulting in 20 s.f. of additional hardcover. Hardcover facts for the 0-75’ and 75- <br />250’ have been adjusted by staff now with the confirmation that other existing improvements are <br />located within the 0-75’ setback area. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1.Would members now approve new construction within the 0-75’ setback area if either <br />matching or additional removals are made to compensate for 20 s.f. of new hardcover <br />within the 0-75’ setback area? ... grade level patio at 175 s.f. or 1.5%, 12 s.f. or 0.1% <br />for upper deck at northeast side of residence at lakeshore?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.