My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-20-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
03-20-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:30:43 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:26:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINirreS OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMNnSSlON <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 20, <br />(#3) #1979 RICHARD LITTLE, 1S90 SHADYT^OOD ROAD • VARUNCES • <br />CONTINUATION OF PCBLIC HEARING - WRITTEN RENOTIFICATION 8:03- <br />8:09 P.M. <br />The applicant, who was out of town, was represettted by his son-in-law. <br />Mabusth said that the application was before the Planning Commission in November and <br />required an updated survey of the shoreline The proposed reconstruction of the 14x26' <br />deck would result in 40 s f of additional hardcover located in the 0-75' zone and the entire <br />deck is located in front of the average lakeshore setback line The Planning Commission <br />had approved the application in November awaiting updated survey showing that the deck <br />was not in the 0-75' zone Mrs Little had given her approval over the phone for the <br />reshaping of the deck to eliminate the deck portion in the 0-75' zone Their representative <br />at this meeting asked that the deck remain as proposed sitting on the original footprint. <br />The trees in front of the deck would remain. <br />Nolan said it would be out of character to approve any structure in the 0-75' zone. He <br />asked the representative if the applicant would consider remo> ing brick hardcover that <br />extended beyond the dimensions of the deck above the patio to reduce hardcover to offset <br />the reconstruction of the deck. 1 tie representative said thiv would be acceptable. <br />Nolan moved. Smith seconded, to approve application #1979 for replacement of the <br />14x26' deck as previously existed with the removal of hardcover extendii^ beyond the <br />deck dimensions in the patio area. Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />(#4) #1999 DAVID AND VICKI VICKERMAN, 2475 DL'NWCX)DY AVENUE - <br />VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 8:09-8:22 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />The Applicants, Mr. and Mrs. Vickerman, were present. <br />Mabusth reported that the application would involve the removal of a 16x24' boathouse <br />and replaced with a 12x 15' deck and access stairs leading down steep bank to the lake. <br />The problem with the stnicture is that it would be 10' above the lake and 9' from the <br />shoreline The code allows for a 8x4' landing with access stairs. <br />The applicant reported that due to the steepness of the lot, there is no where to do <br />anything to enjoy the lake without being able to walk out onto a deck. This would be the <br />only access to the lake and use of the lakeshore itself Mrs. Vickerman asked if a wood <br />deck could be installed where the boathouse is now located.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.