Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1950 <br />March 10, 1995 <br />Paec 3 <br />Review of Amended Proposal <br />Applicant has reduced the footprint from the original proposal by 211 s.f. The new <br />structure will be located 52 ’ from the shoreline rather than 41 ’ as originally proposed with <br />construction of a lakeside deck. The current proposal proposes no deck expansions within the <br />lakeshore yard. The proposal now involves 192 s.f. expansion of living space and 484 s.f. for <br />attached garage. All other setback requirements are met except for the lakeshore setback. <br />Hardcover is increased 68 s.f. or 0.81% over the e.xisting le\el at 21.4%. Hardco\er is now <br />proposed at 22.2% (oricinal projwsal 26.7%). The majority ot the hardcover proposed within <br />the 75-250 ’ setback area. 550 s.f. of driveway should not technically be credited as hardcover <br />because it is located within an easement area that has been excluded from total lot area. <br />Structural coverage is proposed at 14.3%. The original application requested 16.1 % with <br />a 1.1 % variance in stnicmral coverage. <br />Please refer to applicant ’s hardship statement. Exhibit M. The neighbors who voiced <br />approval and support of Mr. Upton s original proposal have now signed a petition approving the <br />amended proposal. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Is the increase of 68 s.f. of hardcover within the 0-75 ’ setback area justified.> <br />2.Has applicant provided acceptable hardships for structural hardcover within the 0-75 ’ <br />setback area? <br />Any recommendation of approval must include the condition that all hardcover scheduled <br />for removal must be completed prior to the footing inspection for the new construction. <br />Applicant may be allowed to retain accessory garage until new garage addition is complet^. <br />The existing detached garage must be removed prior to the final inspection for the new addition <br />to the principal residence. <br />i <br />A