My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-20-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
03-20-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:30:43 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:26:26 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMNASSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 20, 1995 <br />(#1 - #2000 Cortlen Cloutier - Continued) <br />Mr Cloutier said he had nothing to add to the report and had no plans at this time for lots <br />3 and 4 He reported that he purchased 4 lots in l%5 The property was platted with a <br />roadway on outlot 1 providing egress and ingress Cloutier said he used (Hitlot 1 for <br />access at one time, and then he put in a guest driveway and now uses access off of <br />Frederick Street The applicant said that the outlot I roadway has existed for over 30 <br />years The driveway he created has been used for less than 30 years along with the access <br />on Frederick Street. The applicant reported he created the access so as not to <br />inconvoiience the residents of lot 2, the Paurus family <br />Mr. Cloutier said he called the County tax division in 1967 and asked for one tax <br />statement He reported that he was not aware that he had legally combirod the lots, which <br />was done. Cloutier would like to divide lot 1 to build a house for his son. The lot dhi»on <br />can be dorre through metes and bounds division through the City The lot meet the area <br />and width requirements With the lot division, the driveway through lot 1 would be <br />removed, as it was never legally installed <br />The Commission members discussed what would happen with lots 3 and 4 if lot 1 were to <br />be divided now. Rowlette said that lot 3 would become a back lot Rowlette questioned <br />whether access would be through a new road or an outlot for the back lots. Lindquitt <br />thought that since it had been subdivided in the past that it would have to be allowed to be <br />so again Rowlette suggested having the city attorney peruse the situation to eliminate a <br />problem with subdivision in the future <br />Wilbur Anderson of 3555 Frederick Street asked how the lots were declared for sewer and <br />water hook-up. Mabusth responded that the property has been assessed for 2 water units <br />but with this sewer project, by lineal footage along the roads were assessed. <br />John Erickson, 1620 Shady wood Road, who owned two lots on Shadywood, which his <br />parents had since 1941, said that people were asked at that time if they wanted one or two <br />tax statements if they had two lots He reported that he has one statement but owns two <br />lots with two sewer stubs. Mabusth agreed that their land use planning was not consistent <br />when sewer and water stubs were given out to properties. <br />Schroeder noted that 3 sewer hookups would be needed if the lots were subdivided. Mr. <br />Cloutier said that the house located on lot 4 is not hooked up on Casco Pt but hooked up <br />through Frederick Street When Casco sewer was installed, he had been asked where he <br />would like the sewer stubbed in. There is a sewer stub to serve lot I at Casco Point Road. <br />An easement runs through lot 1 for lot 3 for both ingress/egress and utilities.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.