Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2002 <br />March 16, 1995 <br />Page 2 <br />Comprehensive Plan - Transportation Section <br />1. CMP 7-12 - Utilization of private roads - rural areas <br />2. CMP 7-17 - Private driveway may serve up to 3 residences <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - <br />B - <br />C - <br />D - <br />E - <br />F - <br />G - <br />H - <br />I - <br />J - <br />K - <br />L - <br />Application <br />Applicant’s Addendum <br />Location Map <br />Wetland Map <br />Topographic Map/Drainage Pattern <br />Plat of Beau Marais-Wetland/Drainage Easements <br />Resolution No. 1978, Preliminary Approval of Beau Marais Plat <br />Resolution No. 2069 Granting Final Plat Approval <br />Option A <br />Option B <br />Option C <br />Ordinance Back Lot/Front Lot Configuration Subdivision <br />Description of Request <br />The two lot plat of Beau Marais was approved by the Council in October of 1986. The <br />resolutions that granted both preliminary and final plat approval (Exhibits G and H) addressed <br />the issues of access if Lot 1 was to be subdivided in the fimire. The subdivider was advised that <br />if three lots were to be created that a private road would have to be installed or access could be <br />achieved from Fox Run, the 60’ road outlot that serves RLS 1249, review Exhibit C. <br />The applicant has provided three options for redevelopment of Lot 1. Option A proposes <br />retaining the use of the existing private driveway that currently serves the two lot division. <br />Option B proposes the use of a private road installed to the east side of the property with a cul- <br />de-sac. Option C would provide access for existing Lot 2 and proposed Lot 1 at Fox Run, a 60- <br />wide tract created in RLS 1249. The owner of the road outlot and property located at 2650 has <br />contacted me to advise that they have no intention of allowing another user of their private road. <br />The City has no underlying easements over the tract as RLS 1249 was filed in May of 1968. <br />There is no way we can force access off of the privately owned roadway . Option C is really <br />not an option. Planning Commission members should consider only Options A and B for this <br />sketch plan review.