My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
02-22-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:31:02 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:26:00 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
draft <br />MINXTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION <br />ON DOMESTIC ABUSE SHELTERS HELD ON JANUARY 20, 1995 <br />allowed via an amendment to the R-IA District and therefore allowed in all residential districts <br />that refer back to R-IA, as long as the performance standards are written so as to limit the <br />potential locations to those which Planning Commission feels are appropriate. <br />Referring to the list of shelters and crisis organizations, Schroeder suggested that there is a <br />general need for shelters and the question the Planning Commission is faced with is what will <br />we do to accommodate that need in Orono. We cannot necessarily support one specific shelter <br />in exclusion of all others. Lindquist noted that as a conditional use, each application would <br />come before the Planning Commission. Hurr suggested it may be possible to restrict the number <br />of shelters within a Eiven area. She suggested Orono should do its fair share but not more than <br />its share. <br />Lindquist requested that staff provide information as to how other cities have dealt with the <br />zoning issues surrounding shelters. <br />Peterson indicated he is generally in support of the shelter but feels there is an apparent lack of <br />documentation of the need, and noted that society has many needs today and unknown future <br />needs that we will have to deal with eventually. We need to balance allowing these uses while <br />appropriately restricting them. <br />Schroeder suggested that at least one additional work session was needed to review the zoning <br />code issues. Discussion ensued as to what level of public notification is intended for the next <br />work session, and whether it should be in the morning or evening. It was generally concluded <br />to do an evening meeting. Staff will do a fax calendar to all Planning Commissioners to <br />establish possible dates for the next meeting. <br />The meeting adjourned at 9:10 a.m.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.